Catherine R. Smith
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Topics
- Gender Diversity and Inequality (11 papers)Work-Family Balance Challenges (7 papers)Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementGender StudiesManagement of Technology and Innovation
- Journals
- Australasian Journal of ParamedicineGender Work and OrganizationCareer Development International
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Catherine R. Smith
21 papers receiving 257 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Sociology and Political Science 163
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 149
- Gender Studies 120
- Management of Technology and Innovation 60
- Social Psychology 48
Countries citing papers authored by Catherine R. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine R. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine R. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine R. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine R. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine R. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine R. Smith. The network helps show where Catherine R. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine R. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine R. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine R. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine R. Smith. Catherine R. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 27 | |
| 7 | 103 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 57 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | Are women being prepared for international management | 2 |
| 13 | Breaking the glass border: barriers to global careers for women managers | 4 |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | Work and family: bibliography: 1969 - 1994 | 3 |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Catherine R. Smith
Catherine R. Smith is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Gender Studies and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 21 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Diversity and Inequality (11 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (7 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (149 citations), Gender Studies (120 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (60 citations). Catherine R. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David F. Elloy, Leonie Still, Margaret Crowley and Barbara Brookes. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, Gender Work and Organization and Career Development International.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.