Catherine Foot
Impact in
-
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
- Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Papers in
-
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 5
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes 1
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare 1
- Oncology 4
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening 4
- Co-authors
- Peter Vedsted (3 shared papers)Chris Naylor (1 shared paper)Candace Imison (1 shared paper)Greg Rubin (2 shared papers)David J. Hunter (1 shared paper)Sally Brown (1 shared paper)Jill Maben (1 shared paper)Jeremy Dawson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- BMC Family Practice (1 paper)Social Science & Medicine (1 paper)Health Policy (1 paper)Nursing Management (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaDenmark
In The Last Decade
Catherine Foot
9 papers receiving 331 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Oncology 90
- General Health Professions 77
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 20
- Health Information Management 8
- Research and Theory 1
Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Foot
This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Foot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Foot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Foot more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Foot
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Foot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Foot. The network helps show where Catherine Foot may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Catherine Foot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 94 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 87 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 71 | |
| 4 | The quality of GP diagnosis and referral | 2010 | 50 |
| 5 | 2014 | 14 | |
| 6 | Measuring the performance of local health systems: a review for the Department of Health | 2015 | 12 |
| 7 | 2011 | 9 | |
| 8 | Targets and prioritization: the case of cancer in the English NHS. | 2012 | 6 |
| 9 | How to improve cancer survival | 2011 | 2 |
About Catherine Foot
Catherine Foot is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Oncology, Health Information Management, Economics and Econometrics and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (5 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers), Medical Coding and Health Information (2 papers), Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers (1 paper), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (1 paper), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (90 citations), General Health Professions (77 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (20 citations), Health Information Management (8 citations) and Research and Theory (1 citation). Catherine Foot has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Peter Vedsted, Chris Naylor, Candace Imison, Greg Rubin, David J. Hunter, Sally Brown, Jill Maben, Jeremy Dawson, Cath Taylor and Ellie Reynolds. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Family Practice, Social Science & Medicine, Health Policy, Nursing Management and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.