Peter W. Rose
Impact in
- Family Practice top 2%
- Oncology top 2%
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
- Cancer survivorship and care
Papers in
- Oncology 33
- Cancer survivorship and care 9
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection 9
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening 8
- Co-authors
- Nada KhanAndreas PrlićSiân HarrisonPhilip E. BourneRafael PereraWilliam HamiltonWolfgang F. BluhmRichard D Neal
- Journals
- British Journal of General Practice (11 papers)Bioinformatics (7 papers)Family Practice (6 papers)British Journal of Cancer (5 papers)PLoS ONE (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Peter W. Rose
140 papers receiving 6.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 205
- Family Practice 128
- Oncology 1.5k
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 679
- Molecular Biology 2.7k
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 448
Countries citing papers authored by Peter W. Rose
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter W. Rose's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter W. Rose with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter W. Rose more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter W. Rose
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter W. Rose. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter W. Rose. The network helps show where Peter W. Rose may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter W. Rose, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 30 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 51 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 44 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 31 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 120 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 17 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 32 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 94 | |
| 17 | Hereditary haemochromatosis: pilot study of case-finding approach to early diagnosis in primary care. | 2001 | 1 |
| 18 | 2001 | 47 | |
| 19 | 2000 | 186 | |
| 20 | Integrated leprosy control in Guyana. | 1978 | 1 |
About Peter W. Rose
Peter W. Rose is a scholar working on Family Practice, Oncology, Health Information Management, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Health Informatics, having authored 140 papers that have together received 7.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protein Structure and Dynamics (28 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (21 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (12 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (9 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (9 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (9 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (8 papers) and Computational Drug Discovery Methods (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (128 citations), Oncology (1.5k citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (679 citations), Molecular Biology (2.7k citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (448 citations). Peter W. Rose has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Nada Khan, Andreas Prlić, Siân Harrison, Philip E. Bourne, Rafael Perera, William Hamilton, Wolfgang F. Bluhm, Richard D Neal, Fiona M Walter and Helen M. Berman. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of General Practice, Bioinformatics, Family Practice, British Journal of Cancer and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.