Mike Richards

3.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
20 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Mike Richards is a scholar working on Oncology, Economics and Econometrics and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Mike Richards has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Oncology, 5 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 4 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Mike Richards's work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (6 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (6 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (5 papers). Mike Richards is often cited by papers focused on Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (6 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (6 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (5 papers). Mike Richards collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Mike Richards's co-authors include Michael Anderson, Elías Mossialos, Benjamin L. Ebert, Paul Carter, Jessica Corner, Adam Glaser, Eva Morris, Amy Downing, Richard Feltbower and Penny Wright and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, British Journal of Cancer and International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.

In The Last Decade

Mike Richards

19 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 100 200 300

Peers

Mike Richards
Joan Neuner United States
Brian D Nicholson United Kingdom
Jon Shelton United Kingdom
Ann Culkin United States
Alexandre L. Pavluck United States
Mandi Yu United States
Joan Neuner United States
Mike Richards
Citations per year, relative to Mike Richards Mike Richards (= 1×) peers Joan Neuner

Countries citing papers authored by Mike Richards

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mike Richards's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mike Richards with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mike Richards more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mike Richards

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mike Richards. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mike Richards. The network helps show where Mike Richards may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mike Richards

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mike Richards. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mike Richards based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mike Richards. Mike Richards is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sheikh, Aziz, Michael Anderson, Sarah Albala, et al.. (2021). Health information technology and digital innovation for national learning health and care systems. The Lancet Digital Health. 3(6). e383–e396. 200 indexed citations
2.
Richards, Mike, Michael Anderson, Paul Carter, Benjamin L. Ebert, & Elías Mossialos. (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care. Nature Cancer. 1(6). 565–567. 358 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Mason, Samantha J., Amy Downing, Penny Wright, et al.. (2018). Health-related quality of life after treatment for bladder cancer in England. British Journal of Cancer. 118(11). 1518–1528. 52 indexed citations
4.
Downing, Amy, Adam Glaser, P J Finan, et al.. (2018). Functional Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life After Curative Treatment for Rectal Cancer: A Population-Level Study in England. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 103(5). 1132–1142. 57 indexed citations
5.
Russo, Philip L., Allen Cheng, Mike Richards, Nicholas Graves, & Lisa Hall. (2016). Evidence based recommendations for a national healthcare associated infection surveillance program. Infection Disease & Health. 21(3). 126–127.
6.
Wright, Penny, Amy Downing, Eva Morris, et al.. (2015). Identifying Social Distress: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Social Outcomes 12 to 36 Months After Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 33(30). 3423–3430. 20 indexed citations
7.
Glaser, Adam, Amy Downing, Eva Morris, et al.. (2015). Quality of life of colorectal cancer survivors in England. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 2 indexed citations
8.
Downing, Amy, Eva Morris, Adam Glaser, et al.. (2015). Quality of life of colorectal cancer survivors in England: report on a national survey of colorectal cancer survivors using Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham). 19 indexed citations
9.
Downing, Amy, Eva Morris, Mike Richards, et al.. (2015). Health-Related Quality of Life After Colorectal Cancer in England: A Patient-Reported Outcomes Study of Individuals 12 to 36 Months After Diagnosis. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 33(6). 616–624. 115 indexed citations
10.
Richards, Mike, et al.. (2014). Inspection as a driver for quality improvement. PubMed. 1(2). 76–79. 2 indexed citations
11.
Glaser, Adam, Lorna Fraser, Jessica Corner, et al.. (2013). Patient-reported outcomes of cancer survivors in England 1–5 years after diagnosis: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open. 3(4). e002317–e002317. 99 indexed citations
12.
13.
Duffy, Sean, Mike Richards, Peter J. Selby, & Mark Lawler. (2013). Addressing Cancer Disparities in Europe: A Multifaceted Problem That Requires Interdisciplinary Solutions. The Oncologist. 18(12). e29–e30. 3 indexed citations
14.
Meechan, David, et al.. (2012). Variation in use of the 2-week referral pathway for suspected cancer: A cross-sectional analysis. British Journal of General Practice. 62(602). e590–e597. 63 indexed citations
15.
Boggon, Rachael, Tjeerd van Staa, Michael Chapman, et al.. (2012). Cancer recording and mortality in the General Practice Research Database and linked cancer registries. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. 22(2). 168–175. 121 indexed citations
16.
Moser, Kath, Julie Cooke, Anthony Maxwell, et al.. (2011). Extending the Age Range for Breast Screening in England: Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility and Acceptability of Randomization. Journal of Medical Screening. 18(2). 96–102. 38 indexed citations
17.
Phekoo, Karen, et al.. (2006). The incidence and outcome of myeloid malignancies in 2,112 adult patients in southeast England.. PubMed. 91(10). 1400–4. 82 indexed citations
18.
Bledsoe, Bryan E, et al.. (2005). Why certain medications should or should not be used for pain management in the field. 30(7). 56–63. 5 indexed citations
19.
Phekoo, Karen, Henrik Møller, Mike Richards, & Steve Schey. (2002). Comparison of a specialist haematological malignancy database against a regional cancer registry: case ascertainment and diagnostic accuracy. British Journal of Haematology. 119(3). 697–705. 9 indexed citations
20.
Thomas, Veronica Nicky, Alison Richardson, Tariq Saleem, et al.. (2000). The efficacy of bilingual health advocacy in ethnic minority patients with cancer. Nursing Standard. 14(26). 32–33. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026