Caroline Shuldham

1.4k citations
50 papers · 1.0k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Caroline Shuldham

45 papers receiving 948 citations

Peers

Caroline Shuldham
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Research and Theory 37
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 25
  • General Health Professions 389
  • Family Practice 25
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 51
Replace Janice Gullick with:
Janice Gullick Australia
Sue Randall Australia
Corine Latour Netherlands
Mohsen Shahriari Iran
Suzanne Fredericks Canada
John Rolley Australia
Felicity Blackstock Australia
Regner Birkelund Denmark
Kathleen F. Hunter Canada
Jo‐Ann V. Sawatzky Canada
Caroline Shuldham relative to Janice Gullick Australia Janice Gullick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Janice Gullick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Shuldham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Shuldham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Shuldham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Shuldham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Shuldham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Shuldham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Shuldham. The network helps show where Caroline Shuldham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Caroline Shuldham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Caroline Shuldham Line = papers co-authored together Caroline Shuldham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999105
2 201498
3 201482
4 200671
5 201165
6 200651
7 200847
8 200745
9 200143
10 201742
11 200737
12 200837
13 200537
14 200631
15 200526
16 201625
17 199922
18 200717
19 200817
20 200813

About Caroline Shuldham

Caroline Shuldham is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Physiology and Surgery, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asthma and respiratory diseases (7 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (7 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (6 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (4 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (4 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (3 papers) and Nursing Roles and Practices (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (37 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (25 citations), General Health Professions (389 citations), Family Practice (25 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (51 citations). Caroline Shuldham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Janelle Yorke, Glenn Robert, Sue Ziébland, Sofia Vougioukalou, Louise Locock, Annette Boaz, Melanie Gager, Jonathan Fielden, Martín Cowie and Helen Goodman. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Journal of research in nursing and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact