Jane Young

19.8k total citations · 3 hit papers
251 papers, 13.5k citations indexed

About

Jane Young is a scholar working on Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Young has authored 251 papers receiving a total of 13.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 123 papers in Oncology, 65 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 63 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Jane Young's work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (47 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (38 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (36 papers). Jane Young is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (47 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (38 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (36 papers). Jane Young collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Jane Young's co-authors include Michael J. Solomon, Gro Jamtvedt, Andrew D Oxman, Mary Ann O’Brien, Jeremy Grimshaw, Phyllis Butow, Noah Ivers, Signe Flottorp, Simon French and Jan Odgaard‐Jensen and has published in prestigious journals such as JAMA, Journal of Clinical Oncology and American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Jane Young

246 papers receiving 13.1k citations

Hit Papers

Audit and feedback: effec... 2006 2026 2012 2019 2012 2009 2006 1000 2.0k 3.0k

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Jane Young 4.6k 3.8k 3.5k 2.9k 1.4k 251 13.5k
Melissa Brouwers 3.0k 0.6× 2.9k 0.7× 4.9k 1.4× 1.7k 0.6× 2.2k 1.6× 209 12.4k
Beth A Virnig 2.2k 0.5× 4.2k 1.1× 3.5k 1.0× 3.6k 1.2× 1.4k 1.0× 234 13.9k
Katherine L. Kahn 3.0k 0.7× 3.3k 0.9× 2.8k 0.8× 1.5k 0.5× 2.2k 1.7× 255 10.6k
Ellen P. McCarthy 2.1k 0.4× 3.4k 0.9× 3.0k 0.9× 1.1k 0.4× 1.2k 0.9× 186 11.8k
Marie‐Louise Essink‐Bot 2.7k 0.6× 2.4k 0.6× 1.7k 0.5× 2.4k 0.8× 1.9k 1.4× 230 13.3k
Mark C. Hornbrook 2.3k 0.5× 2.2k 0.6× 2.1k 0.6× 1.9k 0.6× 2.0k 1.5× 200 10.5k
Evelyn P Whitlock 2.8k 0.6× 2.0k 0.5× 3.3k 1.0× 1.4k 0.5× 735 0.5× 174 12.5k
Chien‐Wen Tseng 2.0k 0.4× 3.5k 0.9× 2.4k 0.7× 1.8k 0.6× 1.3k 1.0× 130 14.8k
Madeleine King 2.7k 0.6× 5.1k 1.3× 2.3k 0.7× 2.0k 0.7× 2.9k 2.1× 304 14.1k
Giovanni Apolone 2.0k 0.4× 1.8k 0.5× 2.1k 0.6× 2.3k 0.8× 1.4k 1.0× 209 14.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Young. The network helps show where Jane Young may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Young

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Young. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Young based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Young. Jane Young is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Ng, Kheng‐Seong, et al.. (2024). High but decreasing rates of reconstruction after total proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis, and evidence of a direct volume outcome relationship. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 94(9). 1598–1609. 1 indexed citations
3.
Brown, Bernadette, et al.. (2023). Clinicians’ Evaluation of Lung Cancer Clinical Quality Indicators and Comparative Performance Data in Practice. European Journal of Cancer Care. 2023. 1–11. 1 indexed citations
4.
Solomon, Michael J., et al.. (2023). Population outcomes, trends and the future of pouch surgery for ulcerative colitis: a 19‐year New South Wales data linkage study. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 93(11). 2686–2696. 3 indexed citations
5.
Steffens, Daniel, Michael J. Solomon, Jane Young, et al.. (2023). A review of patient recruitment in randomised controlled trials of preoperative exercise. Clinical Trials. 21(3). 371–380. 3 indexed citations
7.
Laidsaar‐Powell, Rebekah, Jane Young, Daniel Steffens, et al.. (2022). Work: saviour or struggle? A qualitative study examining employment and finances in colorectal cancer survivors living with advanced cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer. 30(11). 9057–9069. 13 indexed citations
8.
Chan, Ka Hung, Marianne Weber, Julia Steinberg, et al.. (2022). Solid Fuel, Secondhand Smoke, and Lung Cancer Mortality: A Prospective Cohort of 323,794 Chinese Never-Smokers. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 206(9). 1153–1162. 15 indexed citations
9.
Steffens, Daniel, Jane Young, Paula R. Beckenkamp, et al.. (2021). Feasibility and acceptability of a preoperative exercise program for patients undergoing major cancer surgery: results from a pilot randomized controlled trial. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 7(1). 27–27. 30 indexed citations
10.
Young, Jane, Rebecca L. Venchiarutti, Ivana Durcinoska, & Daniel Steffens. (2019). <p>Cross-Cultural Adaptation And Pilot Testing Of The Cancer Care Coordination Questionnaire For Patients (CCCQ-P) In Chinese And Arabic Languages</p>. Patient Preference and Adherence. Volume 13. 1791–1797. 2 indexed citations
11.
Steffens, Daniel, Jane Young, Michael J. Solomon, et al.. (2019). Preliminary evidence for physical activity following pelvic exenteration: a pilot longitudinal cohort study. BMC Cancer. 19(1). 661–661. 11 indexed citations
12.
Egger, Sam, David P. Smith, Bernadette Brown, et al.. (2019). Urologists’ referral and radiation oncologists’ treatment patterns regarding high‐risk prostate cancer patients receiving radiotherapy within 6 months after radical prostatectomy: A prospective cohort analysis. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology. 64(1). 134–143. 3 indexed citations
13.
Venchiarutti, Rebecca L., Michael J. Solomon, Cherry Koh, Jane Young, & Daniel Steffens. (2019). Pushing the boundaries of pelvic exenteration by maintaining survival at the cost of morbidity. British journal of surgery. 106(10). 1393–1403. 43 indexed citations
14.
McBride, Kate, Daniel Steffens, Michael J. Solomon, et al.. (2019). Research as the gatekeeper: introduction ofrobotic-assisted surgery into the public sector. Australian Health Review. 43(6). 676–681. 5 indexed citations
15.
Steffens, Daniel, Michael J. Solomon, Jane Young, et al.. (2018). Cohort study of long-term survival and quality of life following pelvic exenteration. BJS Open. 2(5). 328–335. 71 indexed citations
17.
Steffens, Daniel, et al.. (2018). Effect of timing on baseline quality of life scores among surgical cancer patients. BMC Research Notes. 11(1). 210–210. 2 indexed citations
18.
Young, Jane, Tim Badgery‐Parker, Lindy Masya, et al.. (2015). Baseline quality of life predicts pelvic exenteration outcome. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 87(11). 935–939. 27 indexed citations
19.
Young, Jane, et al.. (2005). How to organize a ‘taster’ week for foundation year 2 doctors. British Journal of Hospital Medicine. 66(10). 587–589. 1 indexed citations
20.
Kerse, Ngaire, Bruce Arroll, Thomas Lloyd, Jane Young, & Jeanette Ward. (2001). Evidence databases, the Internet, and general practitioners: the New Zealand story.. PubMed. 114(1127). 89–91. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026