Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Robertson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Robertson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Robertson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Robertson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Robertson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Robertson. The network helps show where Ruth Robertson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Robertson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Robertson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Robertson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Robertson. Ruth Robertson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Boyd, Alan, et al.. (2018). How hospital survey teams function. Journal of Health Organization and Management. 32(2). 206–223.7 indexed citations
2.
Richardson, Emma, Kieran Walshe, Ruth Robertson, et al.. (2018). Impact of the Care Quality Commission on provider performance: room for improvement?. Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University).17 indexed citations
3.
Robertson, Ruth, et al.. (2012). Oceans apart: the higher health costs of women in the U.S. compared to other nations, and how reform is helping.. PubMed. 19. 1–20.
4.
Collins, Sara R., et al.. (2012). Young, uninsured, and in debt: why young adults lack health insurance and how the Affordable Care Act is helping: findings from the Commonwealth Fund Health Insurance Tracking Survey of Young Adults, 2011.. PubMed. 14. 1–24.40 indexed citations
5.
Vrangbæk, Karsten, Ruth Robertson, Ulrika Winblad, Hester van de Bovenkamp, & Anna Dixon. (2012). Choice policies in Northern European health systems. Health Economics Policy and Law. 7(1). 47–71.59 indexed citations
6.
Collins, Sara R., et al.. (2012). Gaps in health insurance: why so many Americans experience breaks in coverage and how the Affordable Care Act will help: findings from the Commonwealth Fund Health Insurance Tracking Survey of U.S. Adults, 2011.. PubMed. 9. 1–22.14 indexed citations
7.
Robertson, Ruth & Sara R. Collins. (2011). Women at risk: why increasing numbers of women are failing to get the health care they need and how the Affordable Care Act will help. Findings from the Commonwealth Fund Biennial Health Insurance Survey of 2010.. PubMed. 3. 1–24.12 indexed citations
8.
Doty, Michelle M., et al.. (2011). When unemployed means uninsured: the toll of job loss on health coverage, and how the Affordable Care Act will help.. PubMed. 18. 1–18.6 indexed citations
Frosini, Francesca, Anna Dixon, & Ruth Robertson. (2011). Competition in the NHS: A Provider Perspective. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 17(1_suppl). 16–22.10 indexed citations
11.
Collins, Sara R., et al.. (2011). Realizing Health Reform's Potential—When Unemployed Means Uninsured: The Toll of Job Loss on Health Coverage, and How the Affordable Care Act Will Help.3 indexed citations
Robertson, Ruth & Sara R. Collins. (2011). Women at Risk: Why Increasing Numbers of Women Are Failing to Get the Health Care They Need and How the Affordable Care Act Will Help. Issue Lab (Candid).11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.