Matthew DeBell
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Education top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Safety Research top 10%
- Co-authors
- Chris ChapmanDavid CrystalJennifer LairdJon A. KrosnickGregory KienzlRoger TourangeauMichael WelshRichard C. Bishop
- Topics
- Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (7 papers)Electoral Systems and Political Participation (5 papers)Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaJapan
In The Last Decade
Matthew DeBell
19 papers receiving 478 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Sociology and Political Science 207
- Education 203
- Economics and Econometrics 81
- Clinical Psychology 65
- Safety Research 64
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew DeBell
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew DeBell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew DeBell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew DeBell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew DeBell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew DeBell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew DeBell. The network helps show where Matthew DeBell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew DeBell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew DeBell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew DeBell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew DeBell. Matthew DeBell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | 116 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | Dropout Rates in the United States: 2002 and 2003. E.D. TAB. NCES 2006-062. | 16 |
| 16 | Computer and Internet Use by Students in 2003. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2006-065. | 88 |
| 17 | Dropout Rates in the United States: 2004. NCES 2007-024. | 87 |
| 18 | Rates of Computer and Internet Use by Children in Nursery School and Students in Kindergarten through Twelfth Grade: 2003. Issue Brief. NCES 2005-111. | 15 |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 53 |
About Matthew DeBell
Matthew DeBell is a scholar working on Communication, Gender Studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 21 papers that have together received 561 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (7 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (5 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (17 citations), Communication (53 citations) and Safety Research (64 citations). Matthew DeBell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Chris Chapman, David Crystal, Jennifer Laird, Jon A. Krosnick, Gregory Kienzl, Roger Tourangeau, Michael Welsh, Richard C. Bishop, Colleen Donovan and Stanley Presser. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Public Opinion Quarterly and Social Indicators Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.