Caroline Brett

62 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Caroline Brett
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 136
  • Health 248
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 305
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 309
  • Clinical Psychology 358
Replace Min‐Huey Chung with:
Min‐Huey Chung Taiwan
Sanna Read United Kingdom
Andrea M. Piccinin Canada
Reg Arthur Williams United States
Louise Lafortune United Kingdom
Christopher R. Beam United States
Yan Cheng China
Kathleen A. Smyth United States
Frank M. Ahern United States
Steven D. Barger United States
Caroline Brett relative to Min‐Huey Chung Taiwan Min‐Huey Chung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Min‐Huey Chung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Brett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Brett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Brett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Brett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Brett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Brett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Brett. The network helps show where Caroline Brett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Caroline Brett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Caroline Brett Line = papers co-authored together Caroline Brett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20231
2 202121
3 202145
4 20203
5 2019103
6 201920
7 201827
8 20179
9 20179
10 2017117
11 201727
12 201688
13 201622
14 20157
15 201135
16 201136
17 2010113
18 2007334
19
Index Britanniae scriptorum : John Bale's index of British and other writers
19906
20
John Leland, Wales, and early British history
19901

About Caroline Brett

Caroline Brett is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, General Psychology, Health, Classics and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 69 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (13 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (11 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (8 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (7 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (6 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (6 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (5 papers) and HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (136 citations), Health (248 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (305 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (309 citations) and Clinical Psychology (358 citations). Caroline Brett has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ian J. Deary, Alan J. Gow, John M. Starr, Wendy Johnson, Alison Pattie, Janie Corley, Vivian Hope, Matthew Hibbert, Lorna Porcellato and Mathew A. Harris. Their work appears in journals such as Intelligence, International Journal of Drug Policy, Quality of Life Research, Psychosomatic Medicine and History of Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026