Quality of Life Research

5.8k papers and 242.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.8k papers published in Quality of Life Research in the last decades have received a total of 242.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Quality of Life Research usually cover Economics and Econometrics (1.4k papers), General Health Professions (1.4k papers) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (765 papers) specifically the topics of Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1.4k papers), Health disparities and outcomes (636 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (608 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Quality of Life Research are Caroline B. Terwee, Kathleen N Lohr, Ron D. Hays, Michael Herdman, David Cella, Henrica C. W. de Vet, Dennis A. Revicki, Jordi Alonso, Suzanne M. Skevington and Xavier Badı́a.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Quality of Life Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Quality of Life Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Quality of Life Research.

Countries where authors publish in Quality of Life Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Quality of Life Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Quality of Life Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quality of Life Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025