Psychosomatic Medicine

6.1k papers and 352.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.1k papers published in Psychosomatic Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 352.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychosomatic Medicine usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.3k papers), Clinical Psychology (1.2k papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (921 papers) specifically the topics of Stress Responses and Cortisol (788 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (753 papers) and Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (644 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychosomatic Medicine are Sidney Cobb, Mardi J. Horowitz, Richard S. Lazarus, Nancy Wilner, Michael A. Babyak, William Alvarez, Kurt Kroenke, Clemens Kirschbaum, Andrew Steptoe and Michael T. McGuire.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychosomatic Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychosomatic Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychosomatic Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Psychosomatic Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychosomatic Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychosomatic Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychosomatic Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025