Caroline Breslin

969 total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 640 citations indexed

About

Caroline Breslin is a scholar working on Media Technology, Mechanical Engineering and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Caroline Breslin has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 640 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Media Technology, 3 papers in Mechanical Engineering and 2 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Caroline Breslin's work include Design Education and Practice (3 papers), Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (3 papers) and Open Education and E-Learning (2 papers). Caroline Breslin is often cited by papers focused on Design Education and Practice (3 papers), Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (3 papers) and Open Education and E-Learning (2 papers). Caroline Breslin collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Caroline Breslin's co-authors include David Nicol, Avril Thomson, Hilary Grierson, William Ion, Andrew Wodehouse, Neal P. Juster, David Nicol, Larry Leifer, Ade Mabogunje and Özgür Eriş and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Educational Technology, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education and Artificial intelligence for engineering design analysis and manufacturing.

In The Last Decade

Caroline Breslin

7 papers receiving 587 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective

2013 605 citations David Nicol, Avril Thomson et al. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education profile →

Peers

Caroline Breslin

EDUCA

DEP

CSA

LLT

IS

Diane Salter Hong Kong

George Moerkerke Netherlands

Stephen Gomez United Kingdom

David G. Lebow United States

Antonia J. Levi United States

Juliana Chau Hong Kong

Bart Huisman Netherlands

Ellina Chernobilsky United States

Meryem Yılmaz Soylu United States

Diane Salter Hong Kong

Caroline Breslin

544 ×1.0

EDUCA

131 ×1.0

DEP

84 ×1.0

CSA

40 ×0.8

LLT

46 ×1.2

IS

Citations per year, relative to Caroline Breslin Caroline Breslin (= 1×) peers Diane Salter

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Breslin

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Breslin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Breslin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Breslin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Breslin

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Breslin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Breslin. The network helps show where Caroline Breslin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Caroline Breslin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Caroline Breslin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Caroline Breslin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Caroline Breslin. Caroline Breslin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Nicol, David, Avril Thomson, & Caroline Breslin. (2013). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 39(1). 102–122. 605 indexed citations breakdown →

2.

Wodehouse, Andrew, Hilary Grierson, Caroline Breslin, et al.. (2010). A framework for design engineering education in a global context. Artificial intelligence for engineering design analysis and manufacturing. 24(3). 367–378. 8 indexed citations

3.

Grierson, Hilary, Andrew Wodehouse, Caroline Breslin, et al.. (2008). An evaluation study of a digital library of ideas: Workflow Model and classroom use. International Journal on Digital Libraries. 9(1). 29–39. 5 indexed citations

4.

Wodehouse, Andrew, et al.. (2008). A task-based approach to global design education. Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln). 666–672. 3 indexed citations

5.

Breslin, Caroline, David Nicol, Hilary Grierson, et al.. (2007). Embedding an integrated learning environment and digital repository in design engineering education: lessons learned for sustainability. British Journal of Educational Technology. 38(5). 805–816. 14 indexed citations

6.

Grierson, Hilary, Andrew Wodehouse, Caroline Breslin, William Ion, & Neal P. Juster. (2006). Building A Design Engineering Digital Library: The Workflow Issues. Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln). 373–378. 4 indexed citations

7.

Breslin, Caroline, et al.. (1998). 22.2: Evaluation Of Flat Panel Display Technologies For An Automotive Night Vision Enhancement HUD System. SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers. 29(1). 329–332. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact