Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Interfacial reaction in Cu/Sn/Cu system during the transient liquid phase soldering process
2010329 citationsJianfeng Li, C. Mark Johnson et al.profile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by C. Mark Johnson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of C. Mark Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Mark Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Mark Johnson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Mark Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Mark Johnson. The network helps show where C. Mark Johnson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Mark Johnson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Mark Johnson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Mark Johnson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with C. Mark Johnson. C. Mark Johnson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mouawad, Bassem, et al.. (2016). Low inductance 2.5kV packaging technology for SiC switches. Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham).10 indexed citations
11.
Li, Jianfeng, et al.. (2016). Selection of materials for IGBT modules to achieve stable short circuit failure behaviour. Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham).1 indexed citations
Bell, Sarah, et al.. (2014). Making Decisions on the Demolition or Refurbishment of Social Housing. UCL Discovery (University College London).2 indexed citations
16.
Castellazzi, Alberto, et al.. (2012). Reliable Integration of Double-Sided Cooled Stacked Power Switches based on 70 micrometer Thin IGBTs and Diodes. 1–6.7 indexed citations
17.
Johnson, C. Mark, et al.. (2007). Scrutinising for Health: health scrutiny evaluative research project. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).3 indexed citations
18.
Johnson, C. Mark, et al.. (1993). Accuracy and validation issues for the simulation of power semiconductor devices. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.1 indexed citations
19.
Johnson, C. Mark & Patrick Palmer. (1990). Improving GTO thyristor reliability by use of linear MOSFET amplifiers and controlled avalanching in gate drive circuits. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.1 indexed citations
20.
Johnson, C. Mark, G. A. C. Jones, W. R. Phillips, & D. H. Wilkinson. (1959). A study of the levels in 19F following the -decay of 19O. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 252(1268). 1–15.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.