Countries citing papers authored by Bruce D. Burns
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Bruce D. Burns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bruce D. Burns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bruce D. Burns more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bruce D. Burns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bruce D. Burns. The network helps show where Bruce D. Burns may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bruce D. Burns
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bruce D. Burns.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bruce D. Burns based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bruce D. Burns. Bruce D. Burns is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Burns, Bruce D.. (2020). Do people fit to Benford's law, or do they have a Benford bias?. Cognitive Science.1 indexed citations
3.
Lee, Joanne & Bruce D. Burns. (2015). Convincing people of the Monty Hall Dilemma answer: The impact of solution type and individual differences.. Cognitive Science.1 indexed citations
4.
Burns, Bruce D.. (2013). Probabilistic reasoning in the two-envelope problem.. Cognitive Science. 35(35).1 indexed citations
Burns, Bruce D.. (2009). Sensitivity to statistical regularities: People (largely) follow Benford’s law. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 31(31).9 indexed citations
7.
Burns, Bruce D.. (2006). Cognitive Neuroendocrinology: Risk Preference Changes Across the Menstrual Cycle. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 28(28).2 indexed citations
Burns, Bruce D. & Mareike B. Wieth. (2003). Causality and Reasoning: The Monty Hall Dilemma. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 25(25).4 indexed citations
11.
Burns, Bruce D.. (2003). When it is Adaptive to Follow Streaks: Variability and Stocks. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 25(25).8 indexed citations
Burns, Bruce D.. (2001). The Hot Hand in Basketball: Fallacy or Adaptive Thinking?. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 23(23).8 indexed citations
14.
Burns, Bruce D., et al.. (2000). Problem Solving: Phenomena in Search of a Thesis. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 22(22).4 indexed citations
15.
Wieth, Mareike B. & Bruce D. Burns. (2000). Motivation in Insight versus Incremental Problem Solving. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 22(22).5 indexed citations
16.
Vollmeyer, Regina & Bruce D. Burns. (1996). Hypotheseninstruktion und Zielspezifität : Bedingungen, die das Erlernen und Kontrollieren eines komplexen Systems beeinflussen. publish.UP (University of Potsdam).2 indexed citations
17.
Burns, Bruce D. & Regina Vollmeyer. (1996). Goals and problem solving : learning as search of three spaces. eScholarship (California Digital Library).2 indexed citations
18.
Vollmeyer, Regina & Bruce D. Burns. (1995). Does Hypothesis-Instruction Improve Learning?. eScholarship (California Digital Library).2 indexed citations
Summers, Jeffery J., David Α. Rosenbaum, Bruce D. Burns, & Stephen K. Ford. (1993). Production of polyrhythms.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 19(2). 416–428.109 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.