Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Self‐Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems
19891.2k citationsMiriam Bassok et al.Cognitive Scienceprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Miriam Bassok's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Miriam Bassok with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miriam Bassok more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Miriam Bassok. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Miriam Bassok. The network helps show where Miriam Bassok may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Miriam Bassok
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Miriam Bassok.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Miriam Bassok based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Miriam Bassok. Miriam Bassok is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
DeWolf, Melissa, Ji Y. Son, Miriam Bassok, & Keith J. Holyoak. (2015). Implicit Understanding of Arithmetic with Rational Numbers: The Impact of Expertise.. Cognitive Science.1 indexed citations
DeWolf, Melissa, et al.. (2014). Semantic Alignment of Fractions and Decimals with Discrete Versus Continuous Entities: A Textbook Analysis. Cognitive Science. 36(36).2 indexed citations
DeWolf, Melissa, Miriam Bassok, & Keith J. Holyoak. (2013). Analogical Reasoning with Rational Numbers: Semantic Alignment Based on Discrete Versus Continuous Quantities. Cognitive Science. 35(35).5 indexed citations
Bassok, Miriam, et al.. (2010). When Two Plus Two Does Not Equal Four: Event-Related Potential Responses to Semantically Incongrous Arithmetic Word Problems. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 32(32).6 indexed citations
11.
Bassok, Miriam, et al.. (2009). Conceptual Integration in Arithmetic is the Same for Digits and Words: It's the Meaning, Stupid!. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 31(31).5 indexed citations
12.
Bassok, Miriam, et al.. (2006). A Theory of Reflexive Relational Generalization. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 28(28).1 indexed citations
13.
Doumas, Leonidas A. A. & Miriam Bassok. (2004). Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science.1 indexed citations
14.
Davidson, Janet E., Janet E. Davidson, Janet E. Davidson, et al.. (2003). The Psychology of Problem Solving. Cambridge University Press eBooks.259 indexed citations
Bassok, Miriam & Keith J. Holyoak. (1993). Pragmatic knowledge and conceptual structure: Determinants of transfer between quantitative domains.. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 68–98.20 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.