Richard Feldman
- Philosophy top 0.05%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Earl ConeeAlvin PlantingaRichard FoleyJames W. CornmanJonathan L. KvanvigErnest SosaGeorge S. PappasKeith Lehrer
- Topics
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (30 papers)Philosophy and Theoretical Science (15 papers)Theology and Philosophy of Evil (4 papers)
- Journals
- The Philosophical ReviewPhilosophy and Phenomenological ResearchThe Philosophical Quarterly
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussiaGhana
In The Last Decade
Richard Feldman
50 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Philosophy 1.6k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 810
- Cognitive Neuroscience 688
- Sociology and Political Science 356
- History and Philosophy of Science 268
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Feldman
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Feldman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Feldman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Feldman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Feldman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Feldman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Feldman. The network helps show where Richard Feldman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Feldman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Feldman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Feldman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Feldman. Richard Feldman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 61 | |
| 2 | 31 | |
| 3 | Deep Disagreement, Rational Resolutions, and Critical Thinking | 23 |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | Evidentialismbreakdown → | 277 |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | Review of Stephen Hetherington, Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge: On Two Dogmas of Epistemology | 1 |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 32 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 30 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 94 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Richard Feldman
Richard Feldman is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (30 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (15 papers) and Theology and Philosophy of Evil (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (1.6k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (810 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (268 citations). Richard Feldman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Earl Conee, Alvin Plantinga, Richard Foley, James W. Cornman, Jonathan L. Kvanvig, Ernest Sosa, George S. Pappas, Keith Lehrer, Peter Klein and Laurence Bonjour. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and The Philosophical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.