Daniel Nolan
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.2%
- Philosophy and History of Science 13
- Philosophy top 0.2%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 19
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 9
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 8
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 4
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 24
- General Decision Sciences top 10%
-
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 5
-
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 4
- Co-authors
- Caroline WestGreg RestallCarrie JenkinsRachael BriggsTaane G. ClarkRobert G. BriggsM. SauerDonald B. Keck
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Daniel Nolan
62 papers receiving 932 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- History and Philosophy of Science 364
- Philosophy 615
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 635
- General Decision Sciences 21
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 122
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Nolan
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Nolan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Nolan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Nolan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Nolan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Nolan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Nolan. The network helps show where Daniel Nolan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Nolan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | Metaphysical Language, Ordinary Language and Peter van Inwagen's Material Beings | 2015 | 2 |
| 5 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 23 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 9 | |
| 9 | Metaphysical language, ordinary and Peter van Inwagen's Material Beings | 2010 | 5 |
| 10 | Non-factivity about knowledge: A defensive move | 2008 | 2 |
| 11 | Liar-Like Paradox and Object-Language Features | 2008 | 1 |
| 12 | 2007 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 11 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 23 | |
| 18 | 1999 | 150 | |
| 19 | Modality, Morality and Belief: Essays in Honour of Ruth Barcan Marcus | 1998 | 10 |
| 20 | 1997 | 87 |
About Daniel Nolan
Daniel Nolan is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (24 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (19 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (13 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (9 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (8 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers) and Theology and Philosophy of Evil (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (364 citations), Philosophy (615 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (635 citations), General Decision Sciences (21 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (122 citations). Daniel Nolan has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Caroline West, Greg Restall, Carrie Jenkins, Carrie Jenkins, Rachael Briggs, Taane G. Clark, Robert G. Briggs, M. Sauer, Donald B. Keck and Ming-Jun Li. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Noûs, Philosophical Perspectives, Inquiry and Philosophy Compass.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.