Laurence Bonjour
- Philosophy top 0.1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Paul K. MoserErnest SosaJames Van CleveLorraine CodeAlvin PlantingaGeorge S. PappasRichard FoleyKeith Lehrer
- Topics
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (13 papers)Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers)Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Laurence Bonjour
37 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Philosophy 1.4k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 818
- Cognitive Neuroscience 495
- History and Philosophy of Science 465
- Sociology and Political Science 266
Countries citing papers authored by Laurence Bonjour
This map shows the geographic impact of Laurence Bonjour's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laurence Bonjour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laurence Bonjour more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Laurence Bonjour
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laurence Bonjour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laurence Bonjour. The network helps show where Laurence Bonjour may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laurence Bonjour
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laurence Bonjour. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laurence Bonjour based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laurence Bonjour. Laurence Bonjour is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | What is it like to be human | 1 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | Epistemology : classic problems and contemporary responses | 54 |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | Knowledge, Belief, and Character: Readings in Contemporary Virtue Epistemology | 5 |
| 9 | 43 | |
| 10 | 155 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 30 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 237 | |
| 20 | 43 |
About Laurence Bonjour
Laurence Bonjour is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (13 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers) and Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (1.4k citations), History and Philosophy of Science (465 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (818 citations). Laurence Bonjour has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul K. Moser, Ernest Sosa, James Van Cleve, Lorraine Code, Alvin Plantinga, George S. Pappas, Richard Foley, Keith Lehrer, Richard Feldman and Peter Klein. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Noûs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.