Alan Hájek

2.9k citations
48 papers · 1.1k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Alan Hájek

47 papers receiving 900 citations

Peers

Alan Hájek
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • History and Philosophy of Science 430
  • General Decision Sciences 160
  • Philosophy 640
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 347
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 194
Replace Branden Fitelson with:
Branden Fitelson United States
Paul Horwich United States
Colin Howson United Kingdom
Richard Pettigrew United Kingdom
Adam Elga United States
Ellery Eells United States
Hannes Leitgeb Germany
David Christensen United States
James M. Joyce United States
William Harper Canada
Alan Hájek relative to Branden Fitelson United States Branden Fitelson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Branden Fitelson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alan Hájek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alan Hájek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alan Hájek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alan Hájek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alan Hájek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alan Hájek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alan Hájek. The network helps show where Alan Hájek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Alan Hájek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alan Hájek Line = papers co-authored together Alan Hájek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003203
2 2007136
3 2007105
4 200362
5
The hypothesis of the conditional construal of conditional probability
199455
6 200853
7 200952
8 199644
9 199836
10 200524
11 201623
12 201122
13
Most Counterfactuals Are False
201419
14 201415
15 201114
16 201413
17 200413
18 201213
19 201213
20 200612

About Alan Hájek

Alan Hájek is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Decision Sciences and Statistics and Probability, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (31 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (25 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (19 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (7 papers), Probability and Statistical Research (3 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (2 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (2 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (430 citations), General Decision Sciences (160 citations), Philosophy (640 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (347 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (194 citations). Alan Hájek has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Lina Eriksson, Ned Hall, Harris Nover, Michael Smithson, Philip Pettit, Branden Fitelson, Mark Colyvan, David J. Chalmers, Włodek Rabinowicz and John Hawthorne. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Analysis, Mind, Erkenntnis and Philosophical Perspectives.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact