Adam Elga
About
In The Last Decade
Adam Elga
14 papers receiving 817 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Philosophy 730
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 388
- History and Philosophy of Science 301
- Cognitive Neuroscience 288
- Artificial Intelligence 159
Countries citing papers authored by Adam Elga
This map shows the geographic impact of Adam Elga's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam Elga with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam Elga more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Adam Elga
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam Elga. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam Elga. The network helps show where Adam Elga may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adam Elga
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adam Elga. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adam Elga based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adam Elga. Adam Elga is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 56 | |
| 9 | Subjective Probabilities should be Sharp | 95 |
| 10 | 384 | |
| 11 | 28 | |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | 49 | |
| 14 | 70 | |
| 15 | 76 | |
| 16 | 158 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.