Brian P. McLaughlin
Impact in
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.2%
- Philosophy and History of Science
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 13
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 20
- Co-authors
- Jonathan CohenJerry A. FodorErnest LeporeVann McGeeWalter Sinnott‐ArmstrongDavid ChalmersChristopher S. HillOwen R. Jones
- Journals
- Journal of Rural Studies (6 papers)Analysis (4 papers)Synthese (3 papers)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (3 papers)Philosophical Topics (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Brian P. McLaughlin
62 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- History and Philosophy of Science 547
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.0k
- Philosophy 720
- Cognitive Neuroscience 596
- General Psychology 19
Countries citing papers authored by Brian P. McLaughlin
This map shows the geographic impact of Brian P. McLaughlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian P. McLaughlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian P. McLaughlin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brian P. McLaughlin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian P. McLaughlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian P. McLaughlin. The network helps show where Brian P. McLaughlin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Brian P. McLaughlin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 14 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 56 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 33 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 23 | |
| 9 | Is role-functionalism committed to epiphenomenalism? | 2006 | 21 |
| 10 | 2003 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2001 | 166 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 30 | |
| 13 | 1997 | 0 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1991 | 185 | |
| 16 | 1989 | 55 | |
| 17 | 1988 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1986 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1984 | 10 | |
| 20 | A new role for rural community councils | 1979 | 1 |
About Brian P. McLaughlin
Brian P. McLaughlin is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and General Psychology, having authored 66 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (20 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (13 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (12 papers), Rural development and sustainability (8 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (5 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (5 papers) and Color perception and design (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (547 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.0k citations), Philosophy (720 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (596 citations) and General Psychology (19 citations). Brian P. McLaughlin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Cohen, Jerry A. Fodor, Ernest Lepore, Vann McGee, Walter Sinnott‐Armstrong, David Chalmers, Christopher S. Hill, Owen R. Jones, Kent Bach and Amélie Oksenberg Rorty. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Rural Studies, Analysis, Synthese, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Philosophical Topics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.