Stephen Leeds

1.7k citations
35 papers · 632 indexed · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Leeds

34 papers receiving 557 citations

Peers

Stephen Leeds
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • History and Philosophy of Science 268
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 298
  • Philosophy 219
  • General Psychology 11
  • Theoretical Computer Science 7
Replace Cynthia Macdonald with:
Cynthia Macdonald United Kingdom
Quentin Smith United States
Chris Swoyer United States
Jack Kaminsky United States
Phil Dowe Australia
Michael Tooley United States
C. A. Hooker Canada
Robert Pargetter Australia
Robin Le Poidevin United Kingdom
Anjan Chakravartty United States
Stephen Leeds relative to Cynthia Macdonald United Kingdom Cynthia Macdonald's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Cynthia Macdonald · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Leeds

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Leeds's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Leeds with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Leeds more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Leeds

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Leeds. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Leeds. The network helps show where Stephen Leeds may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Leeds, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Leeds Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Leeds links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Agricultural Finance in Kosovo
20171
2 20073
3 20077
4 20064
5 200317
6 2001166
7 20005
8 19973
9 19962
10 199517
11 199411
12 19945
13 198910
14 19845
15 19795
16
Theories of Truth and Reference
19786
17 19781
18 19741
19 197320
20 19733

About Stephen Leeds

Stephen Leeds is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Decision Sciences and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 35 papers that have together received 632 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (6 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (2 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (2 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Science and Climate Studies (2 papers) and Statistical Mechanics and Entropy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (268 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (298 citations), Philosophy (219 citations), General Psychology (11 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (7 citations). Stephen Leeds has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include C. Wade Savage, Noa Latham, Georges Rey, Jaegwon Kim, Colin McGinn, Terence Horgan, Barry Loewer, Brian P. McLaughlin, Tim Crane and Carl Gillett. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, Philosophical Studies, Noûs, Synthese and Erkenntnis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026