D. Gene Witmer
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Philosophy top 1%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Kelly TrogdonCarl GillettNoa LathamGeorges ReyStephen LeedsJaegwon KimColin McGinnTerence Horgan
- Topics
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers)Philosophy and History of Science (8 papers)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers)
- Journals
- The Philosophical ReviewPhilosophy and Phenomenological ResearchThe Philosophical Quarterly
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
D. Gene Witmer
19 papers receiving 362 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 294
- History and Philosophy of Science 240
- Philosophy 227
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 72
- Cognitive Neuroscience 68
Countries citing papers authored by D. Gene Witmer
This map shows the geographic impact of D. Gene Witmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Gene Witmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Gene Witmer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. Gene Witmer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Gene Witmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Gene Witmer. The network helps show where D. Gene Witmer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. Gene Witmer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. Gene Witmer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. Gene Witmer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. Gene Witmer. D. Gene Witmer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | Platonistic Physicalism without Tears | 0 |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 48 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 166 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 103 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About D. Gene Witmer
D. Gene Witmer is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 22 papers that have together received 424 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (8 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (240 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (294 citations) and Philosophy (227 citations). D. Gene Witmer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Kelly Trogdon, Carl Gillett, Noa Latham, Georges Rey, Stephen Leeds, Jaegwon Kim, Colin McGinn, Terence Horgan, Barry Loewer and Brian P. McLaughlin. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and The Philosophical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.