Vann McGee
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Philosophy and History of Science 5
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 7
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 3
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 2
- Theoretical Computer Science top 5%
- General Decision Sciences top 10%
-
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 7
- Logic, programming, and type systems 3
-
- Advanced Algebra and Logic 4
- semigroups and automata theory 2
- Co-authors
- Brian P. McLaughlinJon BarwiseJamie TappendenGeorge BoolosAgustín RayoDavid H. SanfordAnil K. GuptaNuel Belnap
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Vann McGee
38 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- History and Philosophy of Science 330
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 739
- Philosophy 513
- Theoretical Computer Science 31
- General Decision Sciences 38
Countries citing papers authored by Vann McGee
This map shows the geographic impact of Vann McGee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vann McGee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vann McGee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Vann McGee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vann McGee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vann McGee. The network helps show where Vann McGee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Vann McGee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 30 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 12 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 14 | |
| 9 | 1997 | 85 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 9 | |
| 11 | 1996 | 45 | |
| 12 | Learning the impossible | 1994 | 46 |
| 13 | 1994 | 30 | |
| 14 | 1993 | 33 | |
| 15 | 1993 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1992 | 59 | |
| 17 | 1989 | 14 | |
| 18 | 1989 | 106 | |
| 19 | 1987 | 8 | |
| 20 | 1981 | 7 |
About Vann McGee
Vann McGee is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (7 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (4 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (3 papers), semigroups and automata theory (2 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (330 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (739 citations), Philosophy (513 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (31 citations) and General Decision Sciences (38 citations). Vann McGee has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Brian P. McLaughlin, Jon Barwise, Jamie Tappenden, George Boolos, Agustín Rayo, David H. Sanford, Anil K. Gupta, Nuel Belnap and Richard T. Oehrle. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, Journal of Symbolic Logic, The Philosophical Review, Journal of Philosophical Logic and The Journal of Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.