John O'Leary‐Hawthorne
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- J. A. CoverMark LanceHuw PriceGraham OppyDaniel Howard‐SnyderPhilip PettitJeffrey K. McDonoughDean W. Zimmerman
- Topics
- Philosophy and History of Science (7 papers)Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
John O'Leary‐Hawthorne
30 papers receiving 421 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 326
- Philosophy 318
- History and Philosophy of Science 189
- Cognitive Neuroscience 100
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 36
Countries citing papers authored by John O'Leary‐Hawthorne
This map shows the geographic impact of John O'Leary‐Hawthorne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John O'Leary‐Hawthorne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John O'Leary‐Hawthorne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John O'Leary‐Hawthorne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John O'Leary‐Hawthorne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John O'Leary‐Hawthorne. The network helps show where John O'Leary‐Hawthorne may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John O'Leary‐Hawthorne
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John O'Leary‐Hawthorne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John O'Leary‐Hawthorne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John O'Leary‐Hawthorne. John O'Leary‐Hawthorne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Language and Philosophical Linguistics, 2003 | 2 |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 47 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 41 | |
| 7 | Free agency and materialism | 11 |
| 8 | The Place of Philosophy in the Study of Mind | 2 |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 45 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 67 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | Philosophy in mind : the place of philosophy in the study of mind | 13 |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About John O'Leary‐Hawthorne
John O'Leary‐Hawthorne is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 514 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (7 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (189 citations), Philosophy (318 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (326 citations). John O'Leary‐Hawthorne has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include J. A. Cover, Mark Lance, Huw Price, Graham Oppy, Daniel Howard‐Snyder, Philip Pettit, Jeffrey K. McDonough, Dean W. Zimmerman and Brian P. McLaughlin. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Noûs and Philosophical Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.