David Chalmers
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Philosophy top 5%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Christopher S. HillBrian P. McLaughlinBetty A. DobratzStephen YabloStephen SteinbergMichal R. BelknapTerry H. AndersonArthur M. Schlesinger
- Topics
- American Environmental and Regional History (2 papers)Race, History, and American Society (2 papers)American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewJournal of American HistoryPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
David Chalmers
9 papers receiving 198 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 112
- Sociology and Political Science 100
- Philosophy 90
- History and Philosophy of Science 68
- Cognitive Neuroscience 46
Countries citing papers authored by David Chalmers
This map shows the geographic impact of David Chalmers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Chalmers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Chalmers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Chalmers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Chalmers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Chalmers. The network helps show where David Chalmers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Chalmers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Chalmers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Chalmers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Chalmers. David Chalmers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Struggle for Social Change in 1960s America: A Bibliographic Essay | 1 |
| 2 | 33 | |
| 3 | 52 | |
| 4 | 102 | |
| 5 | 29 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | Committed, Proud, and Distrustful: The Mississippi Freedom Volunteers 20 Years Later. | 0 |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1 |
About David Chalmers
David Chalmers is a scholar working on General Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 13 papers that have together received 248 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Environmental and Regional History (2 papers), Race, History, and American Society (2 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (68 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (112 citations) and Philosophy (90 citations). David Chalmers has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Christopher S. Hill, Brian P. McLaughlin, Betty A. Dobratz, Stephen Yablo, Stephen Steinberg, Michal R. Belknap, Terry H. Anderson, Arthur M. Schlesinger, Clayborne Carson and Kenneth O’Reilly. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.