Brian J. Oppy

560 total citations
9 papers, 454 citations indexed

About

Brian J. Oppy is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Brian J. Oppy has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 454 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 5 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 1 paper in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Brian J. Oppy's work include Reading and Literacy Development (5 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (3 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (3 papers). Brian J. Oppy is often cited by papers focused on Reading and Literacy Development (5 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (3 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (3 papers). Brian J. Oppy collaborates with scholars based in United States. Brian J. Oppy's co-authors include Debra L. Long, Douglas L. Hintzman, Tim Curran, Hai Yang, Ryuichi Kitamura, Paul P. Jovanis, Robert B. Post, Mohamed Abdel‐Aty and Jonathan M. Golding and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Journal of Memory and Language and Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

In The Last Decade

Brian J. Oppy

9 papers receiving 396 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Brian J. Oppy United States 8 271 270 100 99 63 9 454
Benjamin Gagl Austria 13 315 1.2× 357 1.3× 31 0.3× 74 0.7× 73 1.2× 22 528
F. Michael Rabinowitz Canada 12 259 1.0× 194 0.7× 67 0.7× 70 0.7× 70 1.1× 48 441
Marcy Lansman United States 9 144 0.5× 163 0.6× 47 0.5× 77 0.8× 186 3.0× 16 418
C. P. Whaley Canada 4 187 0.7× 173 0.6× 30 0.3× 63 0.6× 90 1.4× 7 323
Marie Izaute France 12 90 0.3× 241 0.9× 71 0.7× 23 0.2× 93 1.5× 27 385
Margaret Schadler United States 8 239 0.9× 141 0.5× 19 0.2× 42 0.4× 103 1.6× 17 381
Michael J. Stroud United States 9 201 0.7× 331 1.2× 48 0.5× 67 0.7× 120 1.9× 19 469
Edward J. Rowe Canada 15 164 0.6× 221 0.8× 55 0.6× 54 0.5× 174 2.8× 30 458
Melanie Cary United States 8 103 0.4× 190 0.7× 101 1.0× 60 0.6× 84 1.3× 10 303
C. J. Brainerd United States 10 163 0.6× 181 0.7× 76 0.8× 67 0.7× 60 1.0× 12 334

Countries citing papers authored by Brian J. Oppy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian J. Oppy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian J. Oppy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian J. Oppy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian J. Oppy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian J. Oppy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian J. Oppy. The network helps show where Brian J. Oppy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brian J. Oppy

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brian J. Oppy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brian J. Oppy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brian J. Oppy. Brian J. Oppy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Long, Debra L., et al.. (2014). The Role of Inferential Processing in Reading Ability. 197–222. 6 indexed citations
2.
Long, Debra L., et al.. (1999). The strategic nature of less skilled readers’ suppression problems. Discourse Processes. 27(3). 281–302. 28 indexed citations
3.
Long, Debra L., et al.. (1997). Individual Differences in Readers’ Sentence- and Text-Level Representations. Journal of Memory and Language. 36(1). 129–145. 83 indexed citations
4.
Long, Debra L., et al.. (1996). The availability of causal information during reading. Discourse Processes. 22(2). 145–170. 21 indexed citations
5.
Long, Debra L., et al.. (1994). Individual differences in the time course of inferential processing.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 20(6). 1456–1470. 117 indexed citations
6.
Long, Debra L., et al.. (1994). Individual differences in the time course of inferential processing.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 20(6). 1456–1470. 7 indexed citations
7.
Abdel‐Aty, Mohamed, Ryuichi Kitamura, Paul P. Jovanis, et al.. (1993). EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS AND MODELING OF SEQUENTIAL ROUTE CHOICE UNDER AN ADVANCED TRAVELER INFORMATION SYSTEM IN A SIMPLISTIC TRAFFIC NETWORK. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 75–82. 29 indexed citations
8.
Hintzman, Douglas L., Tim Curran, & Brian J. Oppy. (1992). Effects of similarity and repetition on memory: Registration without learning?. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 18(4). 667–680. 103 indexed citations
9.
Hintzman, Douglas L., Tim Curran, & Brian J. Oppy. (1992). Effects of similarity and repetition on memory: Registration without learning?. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 18(4). 667–680. 60 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026