Journal of Memory and Language
About
In The Last Decade
Journal of Memory and Language
2.2k papers receiving 177.2k citations
Fields of papers published in Journal of Memory and Language
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Memory and Language. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Memory and Language.
Countries where authors publish in Journal of Memory and Language
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Memory and Language. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Memory and Language with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Memory and Language more than expected).
- Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal (2013)
- Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items (2008)
- A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory (1991)
- The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research (2002)
- Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models (2008)
- Is working memory capacity task dependent? (1989)
- Category Interference in Translation and Picture Naming: Evidence for Asymmetric Connections Between Bilingual Memory Representations (1994)
- Memory and the self☆ (2005)
- Word Segmentation: The Role of Distributional Cues (1996)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.