Brian Dillon

2.2k total citations
53 papers, 912 citations indexed

About

Brian Dillon is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Language and Linguistics. According to data from OpenAlex, Brian Dillon has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 912 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 21 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 19 papers in Language and Linguistics. Recurrent topics in Brian Dillon's work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (29 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (16 papers) and Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (14 papers). Brian Dillon is often cited by papers focused on Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (29 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (16 papers) and Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (14 papers). Brian Dillon collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Brian Dillon's co-authors include Colin Phillips, Shayne Sloggett, Alan Mishler, Ming Xiang, Adrian Staub, Andrew Nevins, Charles Clifton, Christopher Hammerly, Matthew Wagers and Lyn Frazier and has published in prestigious journals such as Brain Research, Cognition and Language.

In The Last Decade

Brian Dillon

50 papers receiving 840 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Brian Dillon United States	15	691	505	325	253	219	53	912
Daniel Grodner United States	11	658 1.0×	483 1.0×	396 1.2×	292 1.2×	330 1.5×	19	1.0k
Masaya Yoshida United States	13	377 0.5×	242 0.5×	375 1.2×	220 0.9×	165 0.8×	41	680
Klinton Bicknell United States	11	490 0.7×	380 0.8×	82 0.3×	315 1.2×	196 0.9×	32	736
Patrick Rebuschat United Kingdom	19	532 0.8×	775 1.5×	484 1.5×	184 0.7×	185 0.8×	45	1.1k
Todd M. Bailey United Kingdom	14	371 0.5×	548 1.1×	162 0.5×	242 1.0×	404 1.8×	17	934
Markus Bader Germany	16	471 0.7×	317 0.6×	465 1.4×	188 0.7×	215 1.0×	45	778
Hartmut Fitz Netherlands	10	622 0.9×	417 0.8×	109 0.3×	117 0.5×	200 0.9×	21	730
Stephani Foraker United States	7	415 0.6×	320 0.6×	156 0.5×	180 0.7×	162 0.7×	8	581
Nuria Sagarra United States	14	492 0.7×	799 1.6×	552 1.7×	143 0.6×	159 0.7×	30	1.0k
Nikole D. Patson United States	12	569 0.8×	472 0.9×	197 0.6×	167 0.7×	233 1.1×	29	849

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Dillon

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Dillon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Dillon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Dillon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Dillon

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Dillon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Dillon. The network helps show where Brian Dillon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brian Dillon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brian Dillon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brian Dillon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brian Dillon. Brian Dillon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Anderson, Carolyn Jane & Brian Dillon. (2023). Grammatical Perspective-Taking in Comprehension and Production. Open Mind. 7. 31–78. 1 indexed citations

Mertzen, Daniela, et al.. (2023). Syntactic and semantic interference in sentence comprehension: Support from English and German eye-tracking data. 2(1). 9 indexed citations

Hammerly, Christopher, Adrian Staub, & Brian Dillon. (2022). Person-based prominence guides incremental interpretation: Evidence from obviation in Ojibwe. Cognition. 225. 105122–105122. 3 indexed citations

Kush, Dave & Brian Dillon. (2021). Principle B constrains the processing of cataphora: Evidence for syntactic and discourse predictions. Journal of Memory and Language. 120. 104254–104254. 14 indexed citations

Vasishth, Shravan, Ralf Engbert, Brian Dillon, & Daniela Mertzen. (2020). Technical report: An investigation of proactive and retroactive interference in sentence comprehension. OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints). 1 indexed citations

Vespignani, Francesco, et al.. (2019). Attachment and Concord of Temporal Adverbs: Evidence From Eye Movements. Frontiers in Psychology. 10. 983–983.

Hammerly, Christopher, Adrian Staub, & Brian Dillon. (2019). The grammaticality asymmetry in agreement attraction reflects response bias: Experimental and modeling evidence. Cognitive Psychology. 110. 70–104. 57 indexed citations

Omaki, Akira, et al.. (2019). Rebels without a clause: Processing reflexives in fronted wh-predicates. Journal of Memory and Language. 107. 80–94. 1 indexed citations

Dillon, Brian, et al.. (2018). A new argument for co-active parses during language comprehension.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 45(7). 1271–1286. 8 indexed citations

10.

Frazier, Lyn, Brian Dillon, & Charles Clifton. (2017). Together They Stand: Interpreting Not-At-Issue Content. Language and Speech. 61(2). 199–226. 6 indexed citations

11.

Dillon, Brian, Joshua Levy, Adrian Staub, & Charles Clifton. (2017). Which Noun Phrases is the Verb Supposed to Agree With? Object Agreement in American English. Language. 93(1). 65–96. 9 indexed citations

12.

Dillon, Brian. (2016). A short discourse on reflexives: a reply to Cunnings (2016). Bilingualism Language and Cognition. 20(4). 679–680. 2 indexed citations

13.

Dillon, Brian, Wing-Yee Chow, & Ming Xiang. (2016). The Relationship Between Anaphor Features and Antecedent Retrieval: Comparing Mandarin Ziji and Ta-Ziji. Frontiers in Psychology. 6. 1966–1966. 8 indexed citations

14.

Dillon, Brian, Wing-Yee Chow, Matthew Wagers, et al.. (2014). The structure-sensitivity of memory access: evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology. 5. 1025–1025. 23 indexed citations

15.

Sprouse, Jon, Philip Hofmeister, Colin Phillips, et al.. (2013). Experimental Syntax and Island Effects. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 96 indexed citations

16.

Dillon, Brian, Charles Clifton, & Lyn Frazier. (2013). Pushed aside: parentheticals, memory and processing. Language Cognition and Neuroscience. 29(4). 483–498. 22 indexed citations

17.

Jessen, S. W., et al.. (2010). Exploring complex 2D layouts for 22nm node using double patterning/double etch approach for trench levels. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7641. 76410A–76410A. 2 indexed citations

18.

Dillon, Brian, et al.. (2009). Illusory licensing across dependency types: ERP evidence. Brain and Language. 108(1). 4 indexed citations

19.

Xiang, Ming, Brian Dillon, & Colin Phillips. (2008). Illusory licensing effects across dependency types: ERP evidence. Brain and Language. 108(1). 40–55. 112 indexed citations

20.

Nevins, Andrew, et al.. (2007). The role of feature-number and feature-type in processing Hindi verb agreement violations. Brain Research. 1164. 81–94. 101 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact