Daniel Grodner

2.2k total citations
19 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Daniel Grodner is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Language and Linguistics. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Grodner has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 6 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 5 papers in Language and Linguistics. Recurrent topics in Daniel Grodner's work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (9 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (4 papers) and Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (4 papers). Daniel Grodner is often cited by papers focused on Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (9 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (4 papers) and Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (4 papers). Daniel Grodner collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Daniel Grodner's co-authors include E. Leigh Gibson, Michael K. Tanenhaus, Edward Gibson, Natalie Klein, Leon Bergen, Daphna Heller, Duáne G. Watson, Todd M. Bailey, Lewis Bott and Timothy Desmet and has published in prestigious journals such as Cognition, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Grodner

19 papers receiving 930 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daniel Grodner United States	11	658	483	396	330	292	19	1.0k
Richard Breheny United Kingdom	14	371 0.6×	324 0.7×	409 1.0×	365 1.1×	193 0.7×	42	874
Wietske Vonk Netherlands	21	762 1.2×	727 1.5×	386 1.0×	470 1.4×	258 0.9×	33	1.2k
Dominiek Sandra Belgium	17	668 1.0×	916 1.9×	331 0.8×	387 1.2×	258 0.9×	59	1.3k
Gary Libben Canada	19	810 1.2×	942 2.0×	339 0.9×	378 1.1×	323 1.1×	63	1.4k
Elsi Kaiser United States	18	497 0.8×	324 0.7×	417 1.1×	453 1.4×	245 0.8×	101	937
Julien Musolino United States	16	395 0.6×	796 1.6×	617 1.6×	208 0.6×	277 0.9×	30	1.3k
Neal Snider United States	9	554 0.8×	542 1.1×	396 1.0×	276 0.8×	340 1.2×	15	1000
Patrick Rebuschat United Kingdom	19	532 0.8×	775 1.6×	484 1.2×	185 0.6×	184 0.6×	45	1.1k
Christina L. Gagné Canada	18	534 0.8×	647 1.3×	247 0.6×	539 1.6×	439 1.5×	71	1.3k
Randall Hendrick United States	14	733 1.1×	609 1.3×	349 0.9×	245 0.7×	260 0.9×	26	1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Grodner

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Grodner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Grodner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Grodner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Grodner

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Grodner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Grodner. The network helps show where Daniel Grodner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Grodner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Grodner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Grodner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Grodner. Daniel Grodner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

19 of 19 papers shown

Grodner, Daniel, et al.. (2021). They is Changing: Pragmatic and Grammatical Factors that License Singular they. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 43(43). 9 indexed citations

Grodner, Daniel, et al.. (2021). Singular "They" In Transition: ERP Evidence And Individual Differences. Works - Scholarship, Research, & Creative Expression (Swarthmore College). 1 indexed citations

Grodner, Daniel. (2020). Using ERPs to investigate the processing of singular they. OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints). 2 indexed citations

Kim, Minjae, et al.. (2019). Social Context Modulates Tolerance for Pragmatic Violations in Binary but Not Graded Judgments. Frontiers in Psychology. 10. 510–510. 9 indexed citations

Tomlinson, Samuel B., et al.. (2018). What do you know? ERP evidence for immediate use of common ground during online reference resolution. Cognition. 182. 275–285. 7 indexed citations

Papafragou, Anna, Daniel Grodner, Daniel Mirman, & John C. Trueswell. (2016). Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Works - Scholarship, Research, & Creative Expression (Swarthmore College). 4 indexed citations

Thibodeau, Paul H., et al.. (2013). The Wished‐For Always Wins Until the Winner Was Inevitable All Along: Motivated Reasoning and Belief Bias Regulate Emotion During Elections. Political Psychology. 36(4). 431–448. 14 indexed citations

Bergen, Leon & Daniel Grodner. (2012). Speaker knowledge influences the comprehension of pragmatic inferences.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 38(5). 1450–1460. 78 indexed citations

Chettih, Selmaan N., Frank H. Durgin, & Daniel Grodner. (2011). Mixing metaphors in the cerebral hemispheres: What happens when careers collide?. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 38(2). 295–311. 11 indexed citations

10.

Bott, Lewis, Todd M. Bailey, & Daniel Grodner. (2011). Distinguishing speed from accuracy in scalar implicatures. Journal of Memory and Language. 66(1). 123–142. 101 indexed citations

11.

Grodner, Daniel, et al.. (2010). “Some,” and possibly all, scalar inferences are not delayed: Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichment. Cognition. 116(1). 42–55. 174 indexed citations

12.

Durgin, Frank H., et al.. (2009). The Use of Categorical Features in Adult Spatial Reorientation. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 31(31). 280. 1 indexed citations

13.

Heller, David, Daniel Grodner, & Michael K. Tanenhaus. (2009). The Real-Time Use Of Information About Common Ground In Restricting Domains Of Reference. Works - Scholarship, Research, & Creative Expression (Swarthmore College). 3 indexed citations

14.

Heller, Daphna, Daniel Grodner, & Michael K. Tanenhaus. (2008). The role of perspective in identifying domains of reference. Cognition. 108(3). 831–836. 111 indexed citations

15.

Grodner, Daniel, Edward Gibson, & Duáne G. Watson. (2005). The influence of contextual contrast on syntactic processing: evidence for strong-interaction in sentence comprehension. Cognition. 95(3). 275–296. 51 indexed citations

16.

Grodner, Daniel & E. Leigh Gibson. (2005). Consequences of the Serial Nature of Linguistic Input for Sentenial Complexity. Cognitive Science. 29(2). 261–290. 276 indexed citations

17.

Gibson, Edward, et al.. (2005). Reading relative clauses in English. Cognitive Linguistics. 16(2). 313–353. 95 indexed citations

18.

Grodner, Daniel, et al.. (2003). Against Repair-Based Reanalysis in Sentence Comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 32(2). 141–166. 25 indexed citations

19.

Grodner, Daniel, et al.. (2002). Syntactic Complexity in Ambiguity Resolution. Journal of Memory and Language. 46(2). 267–295. 37 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact