Benjamin Schmid
Impact in
- Aging top 5%
- Developmental Neuroscience top 5%
- Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Papers in
-
- Pluripotent Stem Cells Research 25
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 22
- Physiology 17
- Biomedical Ethics and Regulation 6
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments 4
- Co-authors
- Thomas Gasser (8 shared papers)Ina Kötter (4 shared papers)Lutz Heide (4 shared papers)Bjørn Holst (24 shared papers)Daniela Berg (4 shared papers)Troels T. Nielsen (16 shared papers)Kristine Freude (11 shared papers)Michela Deleidi (2 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Benjamin Schmid
60 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Aging 70
- Developmental Neuroscience 133
- Neurology 412
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 389
- Physiology 551
Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Schmid
This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Schmid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Schmid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Schmid more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Schmid
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Schmid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Schmid. The network helps show where Benjamin Schmid may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Schmid, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | iPSC-derived neurons from GBA1-associated Parkinson’s disease patients show autophagic defects and impaired calcium homeostasis Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 406 |
| 2 | 2013 | 295 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 102 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 95 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 86 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 69 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 64 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 61 | |
| 9 | 1992 | 56 | |
| 10 | 1991 | 50 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 46 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 42 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 33 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 32 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 30 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 27 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 24 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 23 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 22 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 22 |
About Benjamin Schmid
Benjamin Schmid is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Plant Science and Aging, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (25 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (22 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (8 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (6 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (6 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (5 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (4 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (70 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (133 citations), Neurology (412 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (389 citations) and Physiology (551 citations). Benjamin Schmid has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Denmark and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Gasser, Ina Kötter, Lutz Heide, Bjørn Holst, Daniela Berg, Troels T. Nielsen, Kristine Freude, Michela Deleidi, David C. Schöndorf and Florian Mayer. Their work appears in journals such as Stem Cell Research, PLoS ONE, Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease and European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.