Ben Pelzer

46 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Hit Papers

The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? 2012 · 1.8k citations
1.8k0+4+9Years since publication50010001.5k

Peers

Ben Pelzer
Comparison fields: 5 of 194
  • Applied Psychology 184
  • Social Psychology 615
  • Communication 166
  • Health 198
  • Sociology and Political Science 979
Replace Richard J. Harris with:
Richard J. Harris United States
Jürgen Bortz Germany
Victor L. Willson United States
Andrew Metcalfe United Kingdom
Thom Baguley United Kingdom
Paul A. Bell United States
Dana R. Carney United States
Dean Lusher Australia
Scott Tonidandel United States
Jay Verkuilen United States
Ben Pelzer relative to Richard J. Harris United States Richard J. Harris's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Richard J. Harris · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ben Pelzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Pelzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Pelzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Pelzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Pelzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Pelzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Pelzer. The network helps show where Ben Pelzer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ben Pelzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ben Pelzer Line = papers co-authored together Ben Pelzer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?
Hit paper breakdown →
20121835
2
influence.ME: Tools for Detecting Influential Data in Mixed Effects Models
Hit paper breakdown →
2012352
3 2010172
4 2017101
5 200498
6 200995
7 201681
8 201043
9 201742
10 200838
11 201436
12 201532
13 201130
14 201427
15 201726
16 201325
17 201625
18 201123
19 201217
20 201915

About Ben Pelzer

Ben Pelzer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Statistics and Probability, Health and Communication, having authored 47 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Capital and Networks (6 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (5 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (4 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (4 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers), Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (3 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (184 citations), Social Psychology (615 citations), Communication (166 citations), Health (198 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (979 citations). Ben Pelzer has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Sweden and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Manfred te Grotenhuis, Rob Eisinga, Rense Nieuwenhuis, Tom van der Meer, Maurice Vergeer, Alexander Schmidt‐Catran, Tom Heskes, Gerbert Kraaykamp, Ruben Konig and Margriet van Hek. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Public Health, Research in Developmental Disabilities, The R Journal, International Journal of Biometeorology and Biodemography and Social Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact