Hans Schilderman
- Health top 5%
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 18
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health 13
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Optimism, Hope, and Well-being 3
-
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues 14
- Conservation top 5%
-
- Religion and Society Interactions 12
- Religion, Society, and Development 5
-
- Religious Education and Schools 7
-
- Cancer survivorship and care 3
- Co-authors
- Hanneke W.M. van LaarhovenC.A.H.H.V.M. VerhagenJudith B. PrinsMichael Scherer‐RathRenske KruizingaPeer ScheepersKris VissersH.J.M. Venbrux
- Journals
- Journal of Empirical Theology (10 papers)Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (4 papers)Cancer Nursing (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Hans Schilderman
35 papers receiving 469 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Health 192
- Clinical Psychology 167
- Applied Psychology 37
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 185
- Conservation 16
Countries citing papers authored by Hans Schilderman
This map shows the geographic impact of Hans Schilderman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hans Schilderman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hans Schilderman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hans Schilderman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hans Schilderman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hans Schilderman. The network helps show where Hans Schilderman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hans Schilderman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 35 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 34 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 10 | The Concept of Religion. Defining and Measuring Contemporary Beliefs and Practices | 2014 | 2 |
| 11 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 25 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 57 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 55 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 26 | |
| 18 | Rites of Passage in a Comparative Perspective | 2005 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2001 | 2 |
About Hans Schilderman
Hans Schilderman is a scholar working on Health, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 497 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (18 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (14 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (13 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (12 papers), Religious Education and Schools (7 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (5 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (3 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (192 citations), Clinical Psychology (167 citations) and Applied Psychology (37 citations). Hans Schilderman has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hanneke W.M. van Laarhoven, C.A.H.H.V.M. Verhagen, Judith B. Prins, Michael Scherer‐Rath, Renske Kruizinga, Peer Scheepers, Kris Vissers, H.J.M. Venbrux, Evert van Leeuwen and Iris D. Hartog. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Empirical Theology, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Cancer Nursing, Journal of Religion Spirituality & Aging and Mortality.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.