Biodemography and Social Biology

710 papers and 10.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 710 papers published in Biodemography and Social Biology in the last decades have received a total of 10.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Biodemography and Social Biology usually cover Gender Studies (213 papers), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (202 papers) and Demography (172 papers) specifically the topics of Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (166 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (121 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (117 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biodemography and Social Biology are Anouch Chahnazarian, J. Richard Udry, Anna Zajacova, Robert A. Hummer, Richard G. Rogers, Bethany G. Everett, Ken R. Smith, Elizabeth E. Epstein, Ruth Guttman and Mike Murphy.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Biodemography and Social Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biodemography and Social Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biodemography and Social Biology.

Countries where authors publish in Biodemography and Social Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biodemography and Social Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biodemography and Social Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biodemography and Social Biology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025