Anne Hofmeyer
- General Health Professions top 1%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ruth TaylorCarole A. EstabrooksD. Scott ThompsonCatherine M. ScottKate KennedyPatrícia MarckMatthew LeachDonna M Dryden
- Topics
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (7 papers)Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (7 papers)Empathy and Medical Education (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Advanced NursingBMC Health Services Research
- Partner nations
- AustraliaCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Anne Hofmeyer
38 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- General Health Professions 913
- Clinical Psychology 314
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 295
- Sociology and Political Science 180
- Education 124
Countries citing papers authored by Anne Hofmeyer
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Hofmeyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Hofmeyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Hofmeyer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Hofmeyer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Hofmeyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Hofmeyer. The network helps show where Anne Hofmeyer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne Hofmeyer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne Hofmeyer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne Hofmeyer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne Hofmeyer. Anne Hofmeyer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 61 | |
| 3 | 40 | |
| 4 | 72 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 33 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 40 | |
| 10 | 245 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 57 | |
| 13 | 32 | |
| 14 | 47 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 39 | |
| 17 | 38 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 30 |
About Anne Hofmeyer
Anne Hofmeyer is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Research and Theory and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (7 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (7 papers) and Empathy and Medical Education (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (79 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (84 citations) and General Health Professions (913 citations). Anne Hofmeyer has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ruth Taylor, Carole A. Estabrooks, D. Scott Thompson, Catherine M. Scott, Kate Kennedy, Patrícia Marck, Matthew Leach, Donna M Dryden, Geoff D.C. Ball and Shannon D. Scott. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Advanced Nursing and BMC Health Services Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.