Jane Warland

2.2k total citations
92 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Jane Warland is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Warland has authored 92 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 34 papers in Clinical Psychology and 29 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Jane Warland's work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (32 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (32 papers) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (13 papers). Jane Warland is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (32 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (32 papers) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (13 papers). Jane Warland collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Jane Warland's co-authors include Louise M. O’Brien, Megan Cooper, Edwin A. Mitchell, Joann O’Leary, Helen McCutcheon, Jillian Dorrian, Tahereh Ziaian, Janna L. Morrison, Alexander Heazell and Peter Baghurst and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Sleep Medicine Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Jane Warland

90 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane Warland Australia 22 575 513 477 391 207 92 1.5k
Debbie Rhea United States 24 337 0.6× 718 1.4× 532 1.1× 647 1.7× 72 0.3× 132 1.8k
Sarah M. Wilson United States 18 459 0.8× 138 0.3× 93 0.2× 93 0.2× 243 1.2× 85 1.1k
Ashley H. Hirai United States 15 246 0.4× 198 0.4× 634 1.3× 297 0.8× 290 1.4× 32 1.1k
Raewyn Mutch Australia 21 417 0.7× 206 0.4× 506 1.1× 70 0.2× 460 2.2× 54 1.1k
Raquel Costa Portugal 17 588 1.0× 342 0.7× 390 0.8× 922 2.4× 103 0.5× 87 1.5k
Kerstin Öhrling Sweden 19 317 0.6× 124 0.2× 465 1.0× 408 1.0× 307 1.5× 40 1.3k
Anna M. Georgiopoulos United States 20 522 0.9× 111 0.2× 225 0.5× 438 1.1× 140 0.7× 70 1.5k
Anna Dencker Sweden 20 396 0.7× 1.4k 2.7× 898 1.9× 1.1k 2.8× 179 0.9× 50 2.0k
Lingling Gao China 21 471 0.8× 466 0.9× 353 0.7× 961 2.5× 231 1.1× 72 1.6k
J. A. M. Hunfeld Netherlands 19 427 0.7× 109 0.2× 774 1.6× 260 0.7× 79 0.4× 36 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Warland

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Warland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Warland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Warland more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Warland

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Warland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Warland. The network helps show where Jane Warland may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Warland

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Warland. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Warland based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Warland. Jane Warland is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Pollock, Danielle, Helen D. Bailey, Sabira Hasanoff, et al.. (2024). First Nations Peoples’ perceptions, knowledge and beliefs regarding stillbirth prevention and bereavement practices: A mixed methods systematic review. Women and Birth. 37(4). 101604–101604.
3.
Warland, Jane, et al.. (2024). Midwives’ and registered nurses’ role and scope of practice in acute early pregnancy care services: a scoping review. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 22(10). 2090–2129. 3 indexed citations
4.
Watson, Stuart, et al.. (2023). A survey of Australian midwives: Experts in nitrous oxide administration within the peripartum setting. Women and Birth. 36(6). 520–528. 1 indexed citations
5.
Griffin, Georgia, et al.. (2023). Patient evaluation of gynaecological information provision and preferences. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 80(3). 1188–1200. 1 indexed citations
6.
Bradford, Billie, Robin Cronin, Jane Warland, et al.. (2022). Fetal movements: A framework for antenatal conversations. Women and Birth. 36(3). 238–246. 4 indexed citations
7.
Cooper, Megan & Jane Warland. (2022). The views and perceptions of water immersion for labor and birth from women who had birthed in Australia but had not used the option. European Journal of Midwifery. 6(August). 1–10. 1 indexed citations
8.
Bradfield, Zoe, et al.. (2022). Midwives’ and registered nurses’ role and scope of practice in acute early pregnancy care services in Australia: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 21(4). 826–832. 3 indexed citations
9.
10.
Warland, Jane, et al.. (2022). Giving sleep position advice in pregnancy: Will we make women anxious?. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 62(4). 536–541. 2 indexed citations
11.
Knight, Alissa, Danielle Pollock, Frances M. Boyle, Dell Horey, & Jane Warland. (2021). Evidence available to guide care during labor and birth for women and their partners who know their baby will be stillborn: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 19(8). 1984–1991. 1 indexed citations
12.
Pollock, Danielle, et al.. (2021). Knowing your audience: Investigating stillbirth knowledge and perceptions in the general population to inform future public health campaigns. Women and Birth. 35(4). e389–e396. 5 indexed citations
13.
Pollock, Danielle, Margaret Murphy, Joann O’Leary, & Jane Warland. (2020). Pregnancy after loss during the COVID19 pandemic. Women and Birth. 33(6). 540–543. 8 indexed citations
14.
Xu, Qunyan, Adrian Esterman, Jillian Dorrian, & Jane Warland. (2020). An examination of the relationship between sunlight exposure and hot flush in working women. Chronobiology International. 37(3). 425–437. 3 indexed citations
15.
Cooper, Megan & Jane Warland. (2019). What are the benefits? Are they concerned? Women's experiences of water immersion for labor and birth. Midwifery. 79. 102541–102541. 11 indexed citations
16.
Pollock, Danielle, Tahereh Ziaian, Elissa Pearson, Megan Cooper, & Jane Warland. (2019). Breaking through the silence in antenatal care: Fetal movement and stillbirth education. Women and Birth. 33(1). 77–85. 12 indexed citations
17.
Heath, Mary, et al.. (2017). Teaching sensitive material: A multi-disciplinary perspective. Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy. 4(1). 11 indexed citations
18.
Greenhalgh, Trisha, et al.. (2016). Understanding Research Methods for Evidence-Based Practice in Health 1e. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 3 indexed citations
19.
Warland, Jane. (2011). Developing Professional Skills in Peer and Self Assessment: Experiences from an Experiential Workshop. Focus on Health Professional Education A Multi-Professional Journal. 12(3). 64. 1 indexed citations
20.
Taylor, David, et al.. (1979). Amblyopia in bilateral infantile and juvenile cataract. Relationship to timing of treatment.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 99(1). 170–5. 40 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Debbie Rhea Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sarah M. Wilson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ashley H. Hirai Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Raewyn Mutch Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Raquel Costa Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kerstin Öhrling Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anna M. Georgiopoulos Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anna Dencker Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lingling Gao Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. A. M. Hunfeld
Rankless by CCL
2026