Anne Hoag

794 citations
18 papers · 518 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Anne Hoag

17 papers receiving 447 citations

Peers

Anne Hoag
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Communication 134
  • Management Information Systems 125
  • Information Systems and Management 88
  • Strategy and Management 171
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 63
Replace Karma Sherif with:
Karma Sherif United States
Robey United States
Michel Kalika France
Margaret Kling Australia
Nikhil Mehta United States
Michael Stankosky United States
Christina Ling-hsing Chang Taiwan
John Trudel United States
Krishna Venkitachalam Australia
Ali Intezari New Zealand
Anne Hoag relative to Karma Sherif United States Karma Sherif's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Karma Sherif · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Hoag

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Hoag's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Hoag with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Hoag more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Hoag

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Hoag. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Hoag. The network helps show where Anne Hoag may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Anne Hoag, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Hoag Line = papers co-authored together Anne Hoag links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 1999157
2 2004148
3 200633
4 201432
5 200831
6 199628
7 201219
8 201412
9 201712
10 200111
11 20179
12
Using case method and experts in inter-university electronic learning teams
20008
13 20177
14 20023
15 20193
16 20023
17 19982
18
Catching up with the Danes – Why Denmark succeeds as a top entrepreneurial country and what we can learn from them
20140

About Anne Hoag

Anne Hoag is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Management of Technology and Innovation, Accounting and Education, having authored 18 papers that have together received 518 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (3 papers), Online and Blended Learning (3 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (2 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (2 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (2 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (2 papers) and Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (134 citations), Management Information Systems (125 citations), Information Systems and Management (88 citations), Strategy and Management (171 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (63 citations). Anne Hoag has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Latvia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Dawn Russell, Brian S. Butler, Charles Steinfield, Robert E. Kraut, Serena Carpenter, August E. Grant, Robert LaRose, Thomas Baldwin, Dunja Antunovic and Brian J. Bowe. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal on Media Management, First Monday, Journalism Practice, D-Lib Magazine and Telematics and Informatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact