Replace Program electronic library and information systems with:
Program electronic library and information systemsUnited Kingdom
Data Science JournalUnited States
Library & Information Science ResearchUnited States
Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and TechnologyUnited States
Design StudiesUnited Kingdom
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)United States
The Information SocietyUnited States
Online Information ReviewUnited States
Library ReviewUnited Kingdom
Big Data & SocietyUnited States
Program electronic library and information systemsUnited KingdomView profile →
Citations per field, relative to D-Lib Magazine
D-Lib Magazine · 1×
×0.76.2kIS
×1.55.0kAI
×0.51.2kISM
×0.4746CNC
×0.2386CONSE
Citations per year, relative to D-Lib Magazine
D-Lib Magazine · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Countries where authors publish in D-Lib Magazine
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in D-Lib Magazine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in D-Lib Magazine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D-Lib Magazine more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in D-Lib Magazine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in D-Lib Magazine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.