Thomas Baldwin
-
- Philosophy, Science, and History 10
- Philosophy and History of Science 5
- Philosophy top 1%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 6
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 13
- Communication top 5%
- Media Studies and Communication 6
-
- French Literature and Criticism 8
- French Literature and Critical Theory 5
-
- ICT Impact and Policies 7
- Co-authors
- G. E. MooreDavid AtkinEdward L. KeenanBradley S. GreenbergRobert StalnakerSteven S. WildmanFrederick FicoDavid Austin
- Journals
- The Philosophical Quarterly (5 papers)French Studies (4 papers)Telecommunications Policy (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesUkraine
In The Last Decade
Thomas Baldwin
72 papers receiving 747 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- History and Philosophy of Science 110
- Philosophy 267
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 267
- Communication 136
- General Psychology 11
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Baldwin
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Baldwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Baldwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Baldwin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Baldwin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Baldwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Baldwin. The network helps show where Thomas Baldwin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Baldwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 34 | |
| 3 | Early philosophical writings | 2011 | 4 |
| 4 | 2006 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 8 | Studies in the philosophy of logic and knowledge | 2004 | 8 |
| 9 | 2004 | 3 | |
| 10 | Russell on Memory | 2001 | 0 |
| 11 | On Considering a Possible World as Actual | 2001 | 37 |
| 12 | 2000 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1997 | 6 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 18 | |
| 16 | 1991 | 37 | |
| 17 | 1983 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1982 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1979 | 6 | |
| 20 | 1978 | 2 |
About Thomas Baldwin
Thomas Baldwin is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory and Communication, having authored 85 papers that have together received 910 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (10 papers), French Literature and Criticism (8 papers), ICT Impact and Policies (7 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers), Media Studies and Communication (6 papers), French Literature and Critical Theory (5 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (110 citations), Philosophy (267 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (267 citations), Communication (136 citations) and General Psychology (11 citations). Thomas Baldwin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ukraine. Frequent co-authors include G. E. Moore, David Atkin, Edward L. Keenan, Bradley S. Greenberg, Robert Stalnaker, Steven S. Wildman, Frederick Fico, David Austin, Paul Zube and Stephen Lacy. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Quarterly, French Studies, Telecommunications Policy, EMBO Reports and Journal of Communication.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.