Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites
20076.7k citationsNicole B. Ellison, Charles Steinfield et al.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communicationprofile →
Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis
20081.3k citationsCharles Steinfield, Nicole B. Ellison et al.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychologyprofile →
Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices
2011945 citationsNicole B. Ellison, Charles Steinfield et al.profile →
A face(book) in the crowd
2006704 citationsCliff Lampe, Nicole B. Ellison et al.profile →
Organizations and Communication Technology
1990557 citationsJanet Fulk, Charles Steinfieldprofile →
A Social Information Processing Model of Media Use in Organizations
1987550 citationsJanet Fulk, Charles Steinfield et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Charles Steinfield
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Steinfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Steinfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Steinfield more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Steinfield
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Steinfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Steinfield. The network helps show where Charles Steinfield may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles Steinfield
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles Steinfield.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles Steinfield based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Charles Steinfield. Charles Steinfield is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Osch, Wietske Van, et al.. (2016). TOWARDS BEHAVIORAL MEASURES OF BOUNDARY SPANNING SUCCESS: THE EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY OF TEAM BOUNDARY SPANNING IN ENTERPRISE SOCIAL MEDIA. European Conference on Information Systems.1 indexed citations
3.
Mansell, Robin, Peng Hwa Ang, Charles Steinfield, et al.. (2015). International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society, 3 Volume Set.2 indexed citations
4.
Steinfield, Charles, et al.. (2015). Intra-Organizational Boundary Spanning: A Machine-Learning Approach. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.2 indexed citations
5.
Osch, Wietske Van & Charles Steinfield. (2013). Boundary spanning through enterprise social software: An external stakeholder perspective. International Conference on Information Systems. 604–621.5 indexed citations
6.
LaRose, Robert, Han Ei Chew, Hsin-yi Sandy Tsai, et al.. (2012). Broadband Adoption| Measuring Sustainable Broadband Adoption: An Innovative Approach to Understanding Broadband Adoption and Use. International journal of communication. 6. 25.6 indexed citations
7.
Lampe, Cliff, et al.. (2011). Inherent Barriers to the Use of Social Media for Public Policy Informatics. 16(1).18 indexed citations
8.
Scupola, Ada & Charles Steinfield. (2008). The Role of a Network Organization and Internet-based Technologies in Clusters: The Case of Medicon Valley. Chapters.2 indexed citations
9.
Steinfield, Charles, Nicole B. Ellison, & Cliff Lampe. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 29(6). 434–445.1329 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Steinfield, Charles, Brian T. Pentland, Mark S. Ackerman, & Noshir Contractor. (2007). Communities and Technologies 2007: Proceedings of the Third Communities and Technologies Conference, Michigan State University 2007. Springer eBooks.10 indexed citations
11.
Lampe, Cliff, Nicole B. Ellison, & Charles Steinfield. (2006). A face(book) in the crowd.14 indexed citations
12.
Greenstein, Shane, Timothy F. Bresnahan, Richard N. Langlois, et al.. (2006). Standards and Public Policy. Cambridge University Press eBooks.110 indexed citations
13.
Steinfield, Charles, et al.. (2004). Consumers Mobile Internet Service Satisfaction and their Continuance Intentions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 332.19 indexed citations
14.
Steinfield, Charles. (2003). New Directions in Research on E-Commerce. Purdue University Press eBooks.8 indexed citations
Adelaar, Thomas, Harry Bouwman, & Charles Steinfield. (2001). Combining Physical and Virtual Channels: Opportunities, Imperatives and Challenges. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 11.10 indexed citations
Butler, Brian S., et al.. (1995). Intermediaries and Cybermediaries: A Continuing Role for Mediating Players in the Electronic Marketplace.. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 1.360 indexed citations
Fulk, Janet & Charles Steinfield. (1990). Organizations and Communication Technology.557 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.