Anna Zarkada‐Fraser

594 citations
17 papers · 465 indexed · h-index 11

Anna Zarkada‐Fraser

17 papers receiving 409 citations

Peers

Anna Zarkada‐Fraser
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Information Systems and Management 97
  • Strategy and Management 196
  • Management Science and Operations Research 152
  • Marketing 110
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 96
Replace Clara Martínez Fuentes with:
Clara Martínez Fuentes Spain
Borut Milfelner Slovenia
Lillian Y. Fok United States
Kuo‐Ting Hung United States
Neil Rackham United Kingdom
Victor Manuel Bennett United States
Roger Bennett India
Torbjörn Stjernberg Sweden
William L. Shanklin United States
Y. K. Shetty United States
Anna Zarkada‐Fraser relative to Clara Martínez Fuentes Spain Clara Martínez Fuentes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Clara Martínez Fuentes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Zarkada‐Fraser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Zarkada‐Fraser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Zarkada‐Fraser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Zarkada‐Fraser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Zarkada‐Fraser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Zarkada‐Fraser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Zarkada‐Fraser. The network helps show where Anna Zarkada‐Fraser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Anna Zarkada‐Fraser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Zarkada‐Fraser Line = papers co-authored together Anna Zarkada‐Fraser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 200410
2 200457
3 200333
4 200214
5 200268
6 200218
7 20018
8 20012
9 20015
10 200127
11 200014
12 200042
13 200080
14 199974
15
Construction management students' perceptions of ethics in tendering
19988
16
Tendering ethics : a study of collusive tendering from a marketing perspective
19981
17 19974

About Anna Zarkada‐Fraser

Anna Zarkada‐Fraser is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Management Information Systems and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 17 papers that have together received 465 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Business and Education (4 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (3 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (3 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Public Procurement and Policy (2 papers), Organizational Strategy and Culture (2 papers) and Construction Project Management and Performance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (97 citations), Strategy and Management (196 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (152 citations). Anna Zarkada‐Fraser has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Campbell Fraser, Martin Skitmore, Fatma Küskü and Göran Runeson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, International Journal of Project Management and The International Journal of Human Resource Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026