Anke Ramakers

452 citations
20 papers · 249 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Anke Ramakers

19 papers receiving 233 citations

Peers

Anke Ramakers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Sociology and Political Science 211
  • General Health Professions 100
  • Clinical Psychology 69
  • Statistics and Probability 16
  • Law 10
Replace Steven N. Zane with:
Steven N. Zane United States
Don Stemen United States
Thomas M. Arvanites United States
Carol Hedderman United Kingdom
Jeffrey Lin United States
Laura Winterfield United States
Natalie Goulette United States
Roxanne Lieb United Kingdom
Richard P. Seiter United States
Belinda R. McCarthy United States
Anke Ramakers relative to Steven N. Zane United States Steven N. Zane's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Steven N. Zane · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anke Ramakers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anke Ramakers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anke Ramakers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anke Ramakers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anke Ramakers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anke Ramakers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anke Ramakers. The network helps show where Anke Ramakers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Anke Ramakers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anke Ramakers Line = papers co-authored together Anke Ramakers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201661
2 201452
3 201831
4 201419
5 201517
6 201716
7 201215
8 20117
9 20206
10 20205
11 20174
12 20163
13 20183
14 20223
15
Barred from employment? A study of labor market prospects before and after imprisonment
20142
16 20241
17 20201
18 20241
19 20141
20 20211

About Anke Ramakers

Anke Ramakers is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations, Clinical Psychology and Statistics and Probability, having authored 20 papers that have together received 249 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (16 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (14 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (7 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (4 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (2 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (2 papers), Comparative and International Law Studies (1 paper) and Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (211 citations), General Health Professions (100 citations), Clinical Psychology (69 citations), Statistics and Probability (16 citations) and Law (10 citations). Anke Ramakers has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Paul Nieuwbeerta, Anja Dirkzwager, Johan van Wilsem, Robert Apel, J.W. de Keijser, Hanneke Palmen, Mikko Aaltonen, Stijn Ruiter, Joni Reef and Holly Nguyen. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Criminology, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, Crime & Delinquency, Labour Economics and Justice Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact