Countries citing papers authored by Johan van Wilsem
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Johan van Wilsem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johan van Wilsem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johan van Wilsem more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Johan van Wilsem
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johan van Wilsem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johan van Wilsem. The network helps show where Johan van Wilsem may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Johan van Wilsem
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Johan van Wilsem.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Johan van Wilsem based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Johan van Wilsem. Johan van Wilsem is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wilsem, Johan van, et al.. (2015). Worden allochtonen zwaarder gestraft? Onderzoek naar etnische verschillen in gevangenisstrafbeslissingen in Nederland. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 36(4). 321–335.
Liem, Marieke, Johan van Wilsem, P.R. Smit, & Paul Nieuwbeerta. (2012). De daling van moord en doodslag in Nederland. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie. 54(1). 18–32.5 indexed citations
Wilsem, Johan van. (2010). Digitale en traditionele bedreiging vergeleken. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie. 52(1). 73–87.1 indexed citations
11.
Wilsem, Johan van. (2010). Digitale en traditionele bedreiging vergeleken. Een studie naar risicofactoren van slachtofferschap. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie. 52(1). 73–87.
12.
Wilsem, Johan van. (2009). 'Draait het om de buurt, de stad, of de school?' [Bespreking van: Weijters, G.G.M. (2009) Youth delinquency in Dutch cities and schools. A multilevel approach. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen]. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie. 51. 311–314.1 indexed citations
13.
Wilsem, Johan van, et al.. (2006). Wapengebruik en letsel bij geweldsmisdrijven: Een onderzoek naar de samenhang van dader-, doelwit- en situationele kenmerken met de wijze van geweldpleging. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie. 35–50.
Wilsem, Johan van, Karin Wittebrood, & Nan Dirk de Graaf. (2003). Buurtdynamiek en slachtofferschap van criminaliteit. Mens en Maatschappij. 78. 4–28.3 indexed citations
16.
Wilsem, Johan van, Karin Wittebrood, & Nan Dirk de Graaf. (2003). Buurtdynamiek en slachtofferschap van criminaliteit: Een studie naar de effecten van sociaal-economische stijging, daling en stabiliteit in Nederlandse buurten. EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam). 78(1).2 indexed citations
17.
Wilsem, Johan van, Karin Wittebrood, & Nan Dirk de Graaf. (2003). Buurtdynamiek en slachtofferschap van criminaliteit [Neighbourhood dynamics and crime victimization: A study on the effects of socio-economic improvement, decline, and stability in Dutch neighbourhoods]. Mens en Maatschappij. 78. 4–28.
18.
Wilsem, Johan van. (2001). Verschillen in slachtofferschap van criminaliteit tussen 27 landen. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie. 43. 158–180.1 indexed citations
19.
Wilsem, Johan van, et al.. (2001). Inkomensdaling op het platteland. 8. 10–11.3 indexed citations
20.
Wilsem, Johan van, et al.. (2000). Jongeren en geweld: De relatie tussen slachtofferschap, daderschap en leefstijl. Radboud Repository (Radboud University). 43. 59–71.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.