Roxanne Lieb
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Epidemiology
- Gender Studies
- Co-authors
- Vernon L. QuinseyLucy BerlinerRobert BarnoskiSteve AosTerry ThomasHazel KemshallSue RexAnthony Bottoms
- Topics
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (8 papers)Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (4 papers)Crime Patterns and Interventions (4 papers)
- Journals
- Annals of the New York Academy of SciencesEuropean NeuropsychopharmacologyCrime and Justice
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Roxanne Lieb
9 papers receiving 188 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Sociology and Political Science 161
- Clinical Psychology 156
- General Health Professions 38
- Epidemiology 18
- Gender Studies 17
Countries citing papers authored by Roxanne Lieb
This map shows the geographic impact of Roxanne Lieb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roxanne Lieb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roxanne Lieb more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Roxanne Lieb
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roxanne Lieb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roxanne Lieb. The network helps show where Roxanne Lieb may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roxanne Lieb
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roxanne Lieb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roxanne Lieb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Roxanne Lieb. Roxanne Lieb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | Accrediting Offender Programmes: A process-based evaluation of the Joint Prison/Probation Services Accreditation Panel | 12 |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 25 | |
| 9 | The Comparative Costs and Benefits of Programs To Reduce Crime. Version 4.0. | 87 |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 81 | |
| 12 | PROTOCOLS AND TRAINING STANDARDS: Investigating Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse | 1 |
About Roxanne Lieb
Roxanne Lieb is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Safety Research, having authored 12 papers that have together received 229 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (8 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (4 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (156 citations), Sociology and Political Science (161 citations) and Gender Studies (17 citations). Roxanne Lieb has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Vernon L. Quinsey, Lucy Berliner, Robert Barnoski, Steve Aos, Terry Thomas, Hazel Kemshall, Sue Rex, Anthony Bottoms, Hans‐Ulrich Wïttchen and Susanne Knappe. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, European Neuropsychopharmacology and Crime and Justice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.