J.W. de Keijser

1.0k total citations
43 papers, 512 citations indexed

About

J.W. de Keijser is a scholar working on Law, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, J.W. de Keijser has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 512 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Law, 20 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 14 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in J.W. de Keijser's work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (14 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (13 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (11 papers). J.W. de Keijser is often cited by papers focused on Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (14 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (13 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (11 papers). J.W. de Keijser collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Slovenia and United Kingdom. J.W. de Keijser's co-authors include P.J. van Koppen, Henk Elffers, Gerben Bruinsma, Paul Nieuwbeerta, Julian V. Roberts, Anja Dirkzwager, Jonathan Jackson, Rien van der Leeden, Brian D. Johnson and Jesper Ryberg and has published in prestigious journals such as Criminology, Aggression and Violent Behavior and Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency.

In The Last Decade

J.W. de Keijser

40 papers receiving 468 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J.W. de Keijser Netherlands 15 370 156 85 83 53 43 512
Susan Bandes United States 12 281 0.8× 80 0.5× 184 2.2× 79 1.0× 125 2.4× 66 505
Arye Rattner Israel 12 389 1.1× 94 0.6× 110 1.3× 91 1.1× 199 3.8× 29 614
Alan M. Dershowitz United States 12 245 0.7× 88 0.6× 67 0.8× 101 1.2× 40 0.8× 53 413
Brendan Lantz United States 17 636 1.7× 137 0.9× 24 0.3× 109 1.3× 77 1.5× 46 704
Stephen P. Garvey United States 13 261 0.7× 132 0.8× 173 2.0× 49 0.6× 89 1.7× 48 464
Daniel W. Van Ness Malta 9 259 0.7× 131 0.8× 79 0.9× 44 0.5× 21 0.4× 14 363
Barbara Sims United States 13 330 0.9× 171 1.1× 16 0.2× 110 1.3× 42 0.8× 24 504
Dawn Moore Canada 12 289 0.8× 101 0.6× 30 0.4× 36 0.4× 47 0.9× 27 419
Ernest van den Haag United States 12 234 0.6× 57 0.4× 53 0.6× 59 0.7× 23 0.4× 55 376
Jon E. Simpson United States 7 350 0.9× 124 0.8× 39 0.5× 58 0.7× 20 0.4× 16 446

Countries citing papers authored by J.W. de Keijser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.W. de Keijser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.W. de Keijser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.W. de Keijser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.W. de Keijser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.W. de Keijser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.W. de Keijser. The network helps show where J.W. de Keijser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.W. de Keijser

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.W. de Keijser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.W. de Keijser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J.W. de Keijser. J.W. de Keijser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Blokland, Arjan, et al.. (2019). Delinquent Development Among Early-Onset Offenders: Identifying and Characterizing Trajectories Based on Frequency Across Types of Offending. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 46(11). 1542–1565. 11 indexed citations
3.
Keijser, J.W. de, et al.. (2018). Plaats delict-onderzoek met vooruitziende blik : Anticiperen op alternatieve scenario’s tijdens het sporenonderzoek op de plaats delict. Leiden Repository (Leiden University). 2018(4). 144–149. 1 indexed citations
4.
Keijser, J.W. de, et al.. (2017). Changes in the Subjectively Experienced Severity of Detention: Exploring Individual Differences. The Prison Journal. 97(5). 644–668. 4 indexed citations
5.
Keijser, J.W. de, et al.. (2015). Woning, werk, wederhelft: Wat is waar van een oude wijsheid?. Leiden Repository (Leiden University). 45(7). 545–553. 1 indexed citations
6.
Keijser, J.W. de, et al.. (2014). Criminal defendants' satisfaction with lawyers: perceptions of procedural fairness and effort of the lawyer. Psychology Crime and Law. 21(2). 186–201. 7 indexed citations
7.
Keijser, J.W. de, et al.. (2012). Public support for vigilantism: an experimental study. Journal of Experimental Criminology. 8(4). 387–413. 22 indexed citations
8.
Keijser, J.W. de, et al.. (2012). Het opmaken van proces-verbaal van een verdachtenverhoor: ervaringen en oordelen van verbalisanten. VU Research Portal. 1 indexed citations
9.
Koppen, P.J. van, et al.. (2010). Reizen met mijn rechter: Psychologie van het recht. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1 indexed citations
10.
Elffers, Henk & J.W. de Keijser. (2009). Het ongeloof in de kloof. Wat moeten we denken van de uiteenlopende resultaten van onderzoek naar de punitiviteitskloof. Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam). 39(8). 842–850. 1 indexed citations
11.
Keijser, J.W. de, et al.. (2009). Bijkans begrepen? Feitelijk en vermeend begrip van forensische deskundigenrapportages onder rechters, advocaten en deskundigen. VU Research Portal. 4 indexed citations
12.
Keijser, J.W. de & Henk Elffers. (2008). Straffen in context. Het effect van referentiekaders op de publieke opinie over straf. VU Research Portal. 50(3). 233–247. 1 indexed citations
13.
Elffers, Henk, et al.. (2007). Newspaper juries. Journal of Experimental Criminology. 3(2). 163–182. 8 indexed citations
14.
Keijser, J.W. de, P.J. van Koppen, & Henk Elffers. (2006). Op de stoel van de rechter:oordeelt het publiek net zo als de strafrechter? [On the judge's chair: Does the general public sentence the same as the judge in criminal cases?]. research memorandum. 2(2). 1–78. 4 indexed citations
15.
Keijser, J.W. de & P.J. van Koppen. (2006). Paradoxes of proof and punishment: Psychological pitfalls in judicial decision making. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 12(2). 189–205. 18 indexed citations
16.
Koppen, P.J. van & J.W. de Keijser. (2004). Het maatschappelijk oordeel van de rechter: de wisselwerking tussen rechter en samenleving. 1 indexed citations
17.
Keijser, J.W. de, et al.. (2004). Strafrechters over maatschappelijke druk, responsiviteit en de kloof tussen rechter en samenleving. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 21–52. 3 indexed citations
18.
Hessing, Dick J., J.W. de Keijser, & Henk Elffers. (2003). Explaining Capital Punishment Support in an Abolitionist Country: The Case of the Netherlands.. Law and Human Behavior. 27(6). 605–622. 18 indexed citations
19.
Keijser, J.W. de, Rien van der Leeden, & Jonathan Jackson. (2002). From moral theory to penal attitudes and back: a theoretically integrated modeling approach. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 20(4). 317–335. 36 indexed citations
20.
Malsch, Marijke, et al.. (1998). Victim-Offender Negotiations: An Exploratory Study on Different Damage Types and Compensation. International Review of Victimology. 5(3-4). 221–234. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026