Countries citing papers authored by J.W. de Keijser
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of J.W. de Keijser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.W. de Keijser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.W. de Keijser more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.W. de Keijser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.W. de Keijser. The network helps show where J.W. de Keijser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.W. de Keijser
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.W. de Keijser.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.W. de Keijser based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J.W. de Keijser. J.W. de Keijser is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Keijser, J.W. de, et al.. (2018). Plaats delict-onderzoek met vooruitziende blik : Anticiperen op alternatieve scenario’s tijdens het sporenonderzoek op de plaats delict. Leiden Repository (Leiden University). 2018(4). 144–149.1 indexed citations
Keijser, J.W. de, et al.. (2015). Woning, werk, wederhelft: Wat is waar van een oude wijsheid?. Leiden Repository (Leiden University). 45(7). 545–553.1 indexed citations
Keijser, J.W. de, et al.. (2012). Het opmaken van proces-verbaal van een verdachtenverhoor: ervaringen en oordelen van verbalisanten. VU Research Portal.1 indexed citations
9.
Koppen, P.J. van, et al.. (2010). Reizen met mijn rechter: Psychologie van het recht. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).1 indexed citations
10.
Elffers, Henk & J.W. de Keijser. (2009). Het ongeloof in de kloof. Wat moeten we denken van de uiteenlopende resultaten van onderzoek naar de punitiviteitskloof. Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam). 39(8). 842–850.1 indexed citations
11.
Keijser, J.W. de, et al.. (2009). Bijkans begrepen? Feitelijk en vermeend begrip van forensische deskundigenrapportages onder rechters, advocaten en deskundigen. VU Research Portal.4 indexed citations
12.
Keijser, J.W. de & Henk Elffers. (2008). Straffen in context. Het effect van referentiekaders op de publieke opinie over straf. VU Research Portal. 50(3). 233–247.1 indexed citations
13.
Elffers, Henk, et al.. (2007). Newspaper juries. Journal of Experimental Criminology. 3(2). 163–182.8 indexed citations
14.
Keijser, J.W. de, P.J. van Koppen, & Henk Elffers. (2006). Op de stoel van de rechter:oordeelt het publiek net zo als de strafrechter? [On the judge's chair: Does the general public sentence the same as the judge in criminal cases?]. research memorandum. 2(2). 1–78.4 indexed citations
Koppen, P.J. van & J.W. de Keijser. (2004). Het maatschappelijk oordeel van de rechter: de wisselwerking tussen rechter en samenleving.1 indexed citations
17.
Keijser, J.W. de, et al.. (2004). Strafrechters over maatschappelijke druk, responsiviteit en de kloof tussen rechter en samenleving. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 21–52.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.