Don Stemen

568 citations
26 papers · 352 indexed · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Don Stemen

24 papers receiving 308 citations

Peers

Don Stemen
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Sociology and Political Science 312
  • Clinical Psychology 121
  • General Health Professions 98
  • Law 29
  • Statistics and Probability 19
Replace Kevin R. Reitz with:
Kevin R. Reitz United States
Valerie West United States
Heather Schoenfeld United States
Paula Kautt United Kingdom
Carol Hedderman United Kingdom
Stephanie Bontrager United States
Natalie Goulette United States
Ronald G. Helms United States
Issa Kohler‐Hausmann United States
Noah Painter‐Davis United States
Don Stemen relative to Kevin R. Reitz United States Kevin R. Reitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Kevin R. Reitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Don Stemen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Don Stemen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Don Stemen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Don Stemen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Don Stemen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Don Stemen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Don Stemen. The network helps show where Don Stemen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Don Stemen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Don Stemen Line = papers co-authored together Don Stemen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20230
2 201824
3
Beyond the War: The Evolving Nature of the U.S. Approach to Drugs
20174
4 201721
5 20172
6 201416
7
The Anatomy of Discretion: An Analysis of Prosecutorial Decision Making Technical Report.
201215
8 20127
9
Rules, Resources, and Relationships: Contextual Constraints on Prosecutorial Decision Making
20123
10 20111
11 201032
12 201013
13 20098
14 200724
15 20051
16 200417
17
Changing Fortunes or Changing Attitudes
20043
18 20046
19 200251
20 20023

About Don Stemen

Don Stemen is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability, Law, Clinical Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 26 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (19 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (14 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (5 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (5 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (4 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (2 papers) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (312 citations), Clinical Psychology (121 citations), General Health Professions (98 citations), Law (29 citations) and Statistics and Probability (19 citations). Don Stemen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Andrés F. Rengifo, Jon R. Sorensen, Ryan C. Meldrum, Besiki Luka Kutateladze, Kecia R. Johnson, Joseph B. Lang, Karen Heimer and David E. Olson. Their work appears in journals such as Crime & Delinquency, Journal of Criminal Justice, Justice Quarterly, Journal of Quantitative Criminology and Evaluation Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026