Labour Economics

1.9k papers and 56.4k indexed citations

About

The 1.9k papers published in Labour Economics in the last decades have received a total of 56.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Labour Economics usually cover Economics and Econometrics (1.3k papers), Sociology and Political Science (583 papers) and General Health Professions (457 papers) specifically the topics of Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (959 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (388 papers) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (328 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Labour Economics are Andrew E. Clark, David G. Blanchflower, James J. Heckman, Lisa Kahn, Tim Kautz, Dan‐Olof Rooth, Jochen Kluve, Joshua D. Angrist, Blaise Melly and Heather Antecol.

In The Last Decade

Labour Economics

1.8k papers receiving 50.9k citations

Countries where authors publish in Labour Economics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Labour Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Labour Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Labour Economics more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Labour Economics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Labour Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Labour Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026