Thomas M. Arvanites

523 citations
12 papers · 319 indexed · h-index 9
Topics
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (8 papers)Crime Patterns and Interventions (6 papers)Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (5 papers)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

Thomas M. Arvanites

12 papers receiving 266 citations

Peers

Thomas M. Arvanites
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Sociology and Political Science 206
  • Clinical Psychology 118
  • General Health Professions 55
  • Social Psychology 44
  • Economics and Econometrics 32
Replace Nicholas N. Kittrie with:
Nicholas N. Kittrie United States
Ronald S. Everett United States
Susan Mary Sherwin-White United Kingdom
Jill Peay United Kingdom
Eric S. Janus United States
KiDeuk Kim United States
Peter Scharff Smith Denmark
Barbara C. Nienstedt United States
Paul Ruschmann United States
Hermann Mannheim United Kingdom
Thomas M. Arvanites relative to Nicholas N. Kittrie United States Nicholas N. Kittrie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Nicholas N. Kittrie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas M. Arvanites

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas M. Arvanites's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas M. Arvanites with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas M. Arvanites more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas M. Arvanites

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas M. Arvanites. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas M. Arvanites. The network helps show where Thomas M. Arvanites may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas M. Arvanites

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas M. Arvanites. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas M. Arvanites based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas M. Arvanites. Thomas M. Arvanites is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 6
2 1
3 103
4 38
5 25
6 19
7 11
8
A comparison of civil patients and incompetent defendants: pre and post deinstitutionalization.
9
9
The differential impact of deinstitutionalization on white and nonwhite defendants found incompetent to stand trial.
4
10 24
11 58
12 21

About Thomas M. Arvanites

Thomas M. Arvanites is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Statistics and Probability, having authored 12 papers that have together received 319 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (8 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (6 papers) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (118 citations), Sociology and Political Science (206 citations) and General Health Professions (55 citations). Thomas M. Arvanites has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert H. DeFina and Henry J. Steadman. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Criminology and Social Science Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026