Thomas M. Arvanites

523 total citations
12 papers, 319 citations indexed

About

Thomas M. Arvanites is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas M. Arvanites has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 319 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Clinical Psychology and 2 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Thomas M. Arvanites's work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (8 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (6 papers) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (5 papers). Thomas M. Arvanites is often cited by papers focused on Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (8 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (6 papers) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (5 papers). Thomas M. Arvanites collaborates with scholars based in United States. Thomas M. Arvanites's co-authors include Robert H. DeFina and Henry J. Steadman and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Criminology and Social Science Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Thomas M. Arvanites

12 papers receiving 266 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas M. Arvanites United States	9	206	118	55	44	32	12	319
Nicholas N. Kittrie United States	5	106 0.5×	97 0.8×	44 0.8×	29 0.7×	6 0.2×	19	248
Jill Peay United Kingdom	11	83 0.4×	165 1.4×	30 0.5×	26 0.6×	9 0.3×	35	244
Ronald S. Everett United States	8	391 1.9×	237 2.0×	49 0.9×	15 0.3×	27 0.8×	12	474
Eric S. Janus United States	11	304 1.5×	317 2.7×	16 0.3×	13 0.3×	9 0.3×	38	398
Naomi Thompson United Kingdom	7	144 0.7×	70 0.6×	89 1.6×	32 0.7×	7 0.2×	23	265
Peter Scharff Smith Denmark	8	245 1.2×	147 1.2×	90 1.6×	20 0.5×	4 0.1×	21	313
George K. Behlmer United States	8	98 0.5×	99 0.8×	28 0.5×	8 0.2×	42 1.3×	13	256
F. H. McClintock United Kingdom	7	248 1.2×	61 0.5×	44 0.8×	9 0.2×	13 0.4×	11	322
Paul Ruschmann United States	11	175 0.8×	64 0.5×	24 0.4×	38 0.9×	45 1.4×	35	314
Barbara C. Nienstedt United States	7	209 1.0×	48 0.4×	27 0.5×	35 0.8×	14 0.4×	9	285

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas M. Arvanites

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas M. Arvanites's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas M. Arvanites with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas M. Arvanites more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas M. Arvanites

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas M. Arvanites. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas M. Arvanites. The network helps show where Thomas M. Arvanites may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas M. Arvanites

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas M. Arvanites. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas M. Arvanites based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas M. Arvanites. Thomas M. Arvanites is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

Arvanites, Thomas M.. (2013). Segregation and African-American imprisonment rates for drug offenses. The Social Science Journal. 51(3). 431–437. 6 indexed citations

Arvanites, Thomas M.. (2013). Cycles of poverty and crime in America’s inner cities by Lewis D. Solomon. Crime Law and Social Change. 61(3). 365–367. 1 indexed citations

Arvanites, Thomas M. & Robert H. DeFina. (2006). BUSINESS CYCLES AND STREET CRIME. Criminology. 44(1). 139–164. 103 indexed citations

DeFina, Robert H. & Thomas M. Arvanites. (2002). The Weak Effect of Imprisonment on Crime: 1971–1998. Social Science Quarterly. 83(3). 635–653. 38 indexed citations

Arvanites, Thomas M., et al.. (1998). State and County Incarceration Rates:. American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 57(2). 207–222. 25 indexed citations

Arvanites, Thomas M., et al.. (1995). The Direct and Indirect Effects of Socio-Economic Variables on State Imprisonment Rates. Criminal Justice Policy Review. 7(1). 27–53. 19 indexed citations

Arvanites, Thomas M.. (1993). Increasing imprisonment: A function of crime or socio-economic factors?. American Journal of Criminal Justice. 17(1). 19–38. 11 indexed citations

Arvanites, Thomas M.. (1990). A comparison of civil patients and incompetent defendants: pre and post deinstitutionalization.. PubMed. 18(4). 393–403. 9 indexed citations

Arvanites, Thomas M.. (1989). The differential impact of deinstitutionalization on white and nonwhite defendants found incompetent to stand trial.. PubMed. 17(3). 311–20. 4 indexed citations

10.

Arvanites, Thomas M.. (1988). THE IMPACT OF STATE MENTAL HOSPITAL DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION ON COMMITMENTS FOR INCOMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL*. Criminology. 26(2). 307–320. 24 indexed citations

11.

Steadman, Henry J., et al.. (1983). Factors associated with a successful insanity plea. American Journal of Psychiatry. 140(4). 401–405. 58 indexed citations

12.

Arvanites, Thomas M., et al.. (1983). Detention Patterns of Successful and Unsuccessful Insanity Defendants. Criminology. 21(3). 439–448. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact