Anita Thomas

2.9k citations
61 papers · 1.9k indexed · h-index 23

Anita Thomas

57 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Anita Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Gender Studies 359
  • Clinical Psychology 557
  • Sociology and Political Science 968
  • Safety Research 178
  • Social Psychology 354
Replace Deborah Belle with:
Deborah Belle United States
Kimberly A. S. Howard United States
Derek K. Iwamoto United States
Bernadette Gray‐Little United States
Katharine H. Zeiders United States
Shelly P. Harrell United States
Chaya S. Piotrkowski United States
Benjamin D. Locke United States
Bill R. Arnold
Virginia W. Huynh United States
Anita Thomas relative to Deborah Belle United States Deborah Belle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
Deborah Belle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anita Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anita Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anita Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anita Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anita Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anita Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anita Thomas. The network helps show where Anita Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anita Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anita Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Anita Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20241
3 20220
4 201610
5 20168
6
Conversations authentiques et CECR : compréhension globale d’interactions naturelles par des apprenants de FLE
20161
7 20141
8 201310
9 201221
10 201117
11 2010118
12
Diminished reproductive fitness associated with the deltamethrin resistance in an Indian strain of dengue vector mosquito, Aedes aegypti L.
200928
13 2008250
14 20053
15 200419
16 200266
17 199037
18 198911
19 19897
20 198834

About Anita Thomas

Anita Thomas is a scholar working on Safety Research, Linguistics and Language and Clinical Psychology, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (14 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (8 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (6 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (5 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (5 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (4 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (359 citations), Clinical Psychology (557 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (968 citations). Anita Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Suzette L. Speight, Karen McCurtis Witherspoon, Sha’kema Blackmon, Denada Hoxha, Jason Hacker, Valda W. Bunker, Sarita Kumar, M. K. K. Pillai, Barbara E. Clayton and Tiffany G. Townsend. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, British Journal Of Nutrition and Age and Ageing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026