Benjamin D. Locke
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Gender Studies top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Co-authors
- Jeffrey A. HayesJames R. MahalikLouis G. CastonguayRyan P. ScottMichael A. GottfriedLarry H. LudlowGary FreitasMatthew A. Diemer
- Topics
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (19 papers)Counseling Practices and Supervision (17 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (12 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Consulting and Clinical PsychologyJournal of Counseling Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyJapan
In The Last Decade
Benjamin D. Locke
59 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Clinical Psychology 1.6k
- Social Psychology 1.2k
- Gender Studies 964
- Sociology and Political Science 569
- General Health Professions 500
Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin D. Locke
This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin D. Locke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin D. Locke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin D. Locke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin D. Locke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin D. Locke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin D. Locke. The network helps show where Benjamin D. Locke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin D. Locke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin D. Locke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin D. Locke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin D. Locke. Benjamin D. Locke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 46 | |
| 7 | Are we in crisis? National mental health and treatment trends in college counseling centers.breakdown → | 297 |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 30 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 45 | |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | 28 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 74 | |
| 17 | 42 | |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 35 | |
| 20 | 199 |
About Benjamin D. Locke
Benjamin D. Locke is a scholar working on General Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 60 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (19 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (17 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (964 citations), Clinical Psychology (1.6k citations) and Social Psychology (1.2k citations). Benjamin D. Locke has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey A. Hayes, James R. Mahalik, Louis G. Castonguay, Ryan P. Scott, Michael A. Gottfried, Larry H. Ludlow, Gary Freitas, Matthew A. Diemer, Andrew A. McAleavey and Rebecca A. Janis. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Journal of Counseling Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.